Talk:Florida, history: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Tom Morris
No edit summary
imported>Donald Albury
(→‎Move: capitalize 'history'?)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
== Move ==
== Move ==
Comma-itis is what we have here. Should be [[History of Florida]] -[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] 09:20, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
Comma-itis is what we have here. Should be [[History of Florida]] -[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] 09:20, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
:Or [[Florida (history)]]? [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 09:43, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
::I would prefer History of Florida (that's what it is called on Wikipedia, from whence it was copied), but I wasn't sure of the outcome of earlier discussions on how to format article names. -- [[User:Donald Albury|Donald Albury]] 10:25, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
:::Well, we've already got (e.g.) [[North Carolina, history]], [[California, history to 1845]], and [[California, history to 1846]], so if the title of this article is to be changed, several others will have to be changed too.  [[User:Bruce M.Tindall|Bruce M.Tindall]] 11:43, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
::::There was [[CZ:History_Workgroup#Naming_convention:_need_a_decision|this]] discussion on how to format such names a few months ago. I haven't found where it was resolved, although Larry Sanger thought it needed to be generalized, and suggested the discussion be moved to [[Talk:Welcome to Citizendium|here]]. -- [[User:Donald Albury|Donald Albury]] 12:08, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
::::Oh, and it's [[North Carolina, History]] (capital H, no redirect from the miniscule version), just to confuse things. -- [[User:Donald Albury|Donald Albury]] 12:23, 29 September 2008 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 12:23, 29 September 2008


Move

Comma-itis is what we have here. Should be History of Florida -Tom Morris 09:20, 29 September 2008 (CDT)

Or Florida (history)? Chris Day 09:43, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
I would prefer History of Florida (that's what it is called on Wikipedia, from whence it was copied), but I wasn't sure of the outcome of earlier discussions on how to format article names. -- Donald Albury 10:25, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
Well, we've already got (e.g.) North Carolina, history, California, history to 1845, and California, history to 1846, so if the title of this article is to be changed, several others will have to be changed too. Bruce M.Tindall 11:43, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
There was this discussion on how to format such names a few months ago. I haven't found where it was resolved, although Larry Sanger thought it needed to be generalized, and suggested the discussion be moved to here. -- Donald Albury 12:08, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
Oh, and it's North Carolina, History (capital H, no redirect from the miniscule version), just to confuse things. -- Donald Albury 12:23, 29 September 2008 (CDT)