Talk:Archive:Should authors share copyright with the Citizendium Foundation?: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Joseph Rushton Wakeling (I think this is a nice summary, what does everyone else think?) |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I think I've covered everything really important now. Does anyone else have comments or suggestions? —[[User:Joseph Rushton Wakeling|Joseph Rushton Wakeling]] 20:31, 24 March 2007 (CDT) | I think I've covered everything really important now. Does anyone else have comments or suggestions? —[[User:Joseph Rushton Wakeling|Joseph Rushton Wakeling]] 20:31, 24 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
The section titled "Citizendium does not have the principles or purpose of the Free Software Foundation" really isn't an argument so much as a loose polemic. Can it be reworded with premises and conclusion more clearly stated? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:31, 29 March 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 03:31, 29 March 2007
Thanks for your work on this, Joseph. I find it quite useful. --Larry Sanger 20:43, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
- I'm very glad to be of help, thank you for your nice words. I'll add some more material tomorrow and also bring across relevant stuff into the commercial use discussion.
- If there's anything in this article that isn't clear or that needs expansion (or greater brevity:-) please let me know and I'll try to fix it. —Joseph Rushton Wakeling 21:45, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
I think I've covered everything really important now. Does anyone else have comments or suggestions? —Joseph Rushton Wakeling 20:31, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
The section titled "Citizendium does not have the principles or purpose of the Free Software Foundation" really isn't an argument so much as a loose polemic. Can it be reworded with premises and conclusion more clearly stated? --Larry Sanger 09:31, 29 March 2007 (CDT)