Search results

! [[Confidence interval]]

...of the population as a whole. Sampling error is typically expressed as a [[confidence interval]] of plus or minus some number of percentage points associated with a stati

...at 1.34 although this increase was not statistically significant with a [[confidence interval]] of 0.30 to 5.97.<ref name="pmid17253458">{{cite journal |author=Walters E

* 95% [[confidence interval]] is <u>+</u> 1.96 * [[standard error]].

...f error is readily quantified as the sample's "standard error", or as the "confidence interval" within which the mean observation may be expected to lie<ref>[http://statt ...at least a stipulate load, or that a variable lies within a stipulated [[confidence interval]]). Among the most powerful of the techniques of statistical analysis is th

...primary outcome 0.79<br/>&bull;&nbsp;relative risk for death 0.89 (95% [[confidence interval|CI]]: 0.80 to 0.99; P=0.047) ...r primary outcome 0.79<br/>&bull;&nbsp;relative risk for death 0.92 (95% [[confidence interval|CI]]: 0.82 to 1.03; P=0.15)

...bolism at 37 months|| 4.8%|| 6.5%|| [[relative risk ratio]] = 0.74 (95% [[confidence interval|CI]]: 0.52 to 1.05; P=0.09) 0.58 (95% [[confidence interval|CI]]: 0.36 to 0.93)

...lleagues analyzed 89 trials and found a ''mean odds ratio of 2.45 (95% confidence interval, 2.05–2.93)'' in favor of homeopathy.<ref name=Linde1997>{{citation ...influenza and influenza-like symptoms (<math>(relative risk (RR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28 to 1.43).</math>). The review of research found evidence for a sm

...nnals.org/cgi/content/full/130/12/995}}</ref> This approach can generate [[confidence interval]]s.

...room''. The upper [http://medinformatics.uthscsa.edu/calculator/calc.shtml confidence interval] for 0% of 135 is 5%, so for statistical reasons alone, there is up to a 5%

* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 97.2% (95% [[Confidence interval|CI]], 96.2% to 98.0%) * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 87.4% ([[Confidence interval|CI]], 84.5% to 89.8%)

...at 1.34 although this increase was not statistically significant with a [[confidence interval]] of 0.30 to 5.97.<ref name="pmid17253458">{{cite journal |author=Walters E

...ee of CVD and hypertension (RR = 0.71 per standard deviation increase; 95% confidence interval: 0.51-1.00).

* [[Confidence interval]]

| [[magnetic resonance imaging|MRI]] || 99%<br/> ([[Confidence interval|95% CI]] 0.23 to 1.00)|| 92%|| 81%|| 100% | [[X-ray computed tomography|CT scan]]|| 39%<br/>([[Confidence interval|95% CI]] 0.16 to 0.69)|| 100%|| 89%^†|| 100%^†

...1 years ||Colorectal cancer death:<br/>[[Relative risk ratio]] 0.67 (95% [[Confidence interval|CI]]: 0.60-0.76)|| align="center"|688

...ents<br/>&bull;&nbsp;5 [[randomized controlled trial|RCTs]]|| OR = 0.80 ([[Confidence interval|95% CI]]:0.74-0.87) ...ients<br/>&bull;&nbsp;8 [[randomized controlled trial|RCTs]]||OR = 0.98 ([[Confidence interval|95% CI]]: 0.89-1.09)

However, I², even when the value is 0%, can be misleading if the [[confidence interval]]s around the value are not provided.<ref name="pmid17974687">{{cite journa

...to <25), obesity (BMI >30) was associated with 111,909 excess deaths (95% confidence interval [CI], 53,754-170,064) and underweight [BMI <18.5] with 33,746 excess deaths

...of death for all patients by 58% for all patients (relative risk 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.89; P=0.02). Overall mortality was 9% (21 deaths) in the high flo