Search results

...lawful enemy combatants who are not entitled to the protections that the [[Third Geneva Convention]] provides to prisoners of war." <ref name=EO13440>{{citation ...that it may be adapted to lawfare. Previously, Common Article 3, and the [[Third Geneva Convention]] and [[Fourth Geneva Convention]] applied to wars between nation states. "

...s from [[wikisource:third geneva convention#article 3|article 3]] of the [[third Geneva Convention]].<ref name=TheJurist060605> [http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/06

Lawful combatant status was further clarified in the 1949 [[Third Geneva Convention]].

...s, so they are may be in violation of [[lawful combatant]] status of the [[Third Geneva Convention]]. They claim [[military necessity]] for this approach, as they would be an

The [[Third Geneva Convention]] states that all captives must be accorded the protections of POW status u

{{r|Third Geneva Convention}}

...Haugesund, north of Stavanger, Norway. At the camp, in violation of the [[Third Geneva Convention]], they were forced to march thirty miles a day, on rough surfaces, to test

...but it is getting to be more difficult. It should be added that I wrote [[Third Geneva Convention]] and [[ex parte Quirin]], and, for that matter, [[Geneva Conventions]], wh ...nts to convene the competent tribunals in a timely fashion.": ''where? The Third Geneva Convention does not contain the word "timely". It mentions "competent tribunal" once.

...nger, Norway. At the camp, in violation of the current conditions of the [[Third Geneva Convention]], they were forced to march thirty miles a day, on rough surfaces, to test

...does not have sovereign rights and is effectively occupied in terms of the Third Geneva Convention. The settlements are not desired by said Authority.

...f both defined mercenaries and of private military contractors under the [[Third Geneva Convention]], it is not at all clear that an independently operating privateer would m

...ry of Defense." ''Competent tribunal'' is a term used in Article 5 of the Third Geneva Convention. There is controversy if the tribunals defined by this Act are in full comp

...ple held there were not entitled to [[prisoner of war]] status under the [[Third Geneva Convention]]. Subsequent concerns about their treatment led to the [[Detainee Treatmen

...the criteria for being eligible for prisoner of war (POW) status under the Third Geneva Convention. The more common language is "unlawful combatant", a lawful combatant meeti

...be prescribed in the [[Fourth Geneva Convention]] for civilians and the [[Third Geneva Convention]] for [[prisoner of war|prisoners of war]]. As opposed to subsequent inter

The Third Geneva Convention require combatants to fulfill certain requirements in order enjoy the right

...the criteria for being eligible for prisoner of war (POW) status under the Third Geneva Convention. The more common language is "unlawful combatant", a lawful combatant meeti

...tter refers, in part, to the obligations of an Occupying Power under the [[Third Geneva Convention|Third]] and [[Fourth Geneva Convention]]s. It was created on 16 May 2003, a

| date = 29 July 1899}}</ref> and then Third Geneva Convention. Generally outside the scope of extrajudicial detention, but more associate

:You may want to refer to some of the provisions of the Third Geneva Convention (http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/91.htm) as well as the U.S. legal decisi