Difference between revisions of "Second Amendment to the United States Constitution"

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(New page: {{main|Gun control}} The '''Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution''' states:<blockquote> A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the peop...)
 
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{main|Gun control}}
{{main|Gun control}}
The '''Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution''' states:<blockquote> A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free
The '''Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution''' states:<blockquote> A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free
Line 4: Line 5:
infringed.</blockquote>
infringed.</blockquote>


There has been much legal argument about the exact meaning of the words of the Second Amendment. "Militia" and "arms", for example, may have had a quite different meaning to the framers of the Constitution than in present society, or they may indeed represent universal aspects of rights.<ref name=GPO>{{citation
There has been much legal argument about the exact meaning of the words of the Second Amendment, especially the "militia clause" preceding the comma. "[[Militia]]" and "arms", for example, may have had a quite different meaning to the framers of the Constitution than in present society, or they may indeed represent universal aspects of rights.<ref name=GPO>{{citation
  | url = http://www.gpoaccess.gov/constitution/html/amdt2.html
  | url = http://www.gpoaccess.gov/constitution/html/amdt2.html
  | title = The Constitution of the United States of America: Second Amendment--Bearing Arms
  | title = The Constitution of the United States of America: Second Amendment--Bearing Arms
  | publisher = Government Printing Office}}</ref>
  | publisher = Government Printing Office}}</ref>


Second Amendment rights are an intense issue in American politics. The [[National Rifle Association]], which strongly supports individual gun ownership, is among the most potent [[interest group]]s in American politics.  Other prominent groups want much stricter controls over private ownership of firearms, on the grounds they contribute to crime or are a hazard to safety.
The NRA position is that the Constitution is authoritative, and arms are needed both for personal protection and to protect the citizens against government tyranny.  Many people, however, differ on the plausibility of needing personal defense, versus armed citizens deterring the military of a modern nation.
Especially in rural areas, however, citizens regard firearms as simple tools for hunting, including for the table, for sport, and for protection against both human and animal dangers. This is well-embedded into cultural tradition.
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}

Latest revision as of 09:12, 1 August 2010

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.
For more information, see: Gun control.

The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states:

A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free

State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be

infringed.

There has been much legal argument about the exact meaning of the words of the Second Amendment, especially the "militia clause" preceding the comma. "Militia" and "arms", for example, may have had a quite different meaning to the framers of the Constitution than in present society, or they may indeed represent universal aspects of rights.[1]

Second Amendment rights are an intense issue in American politics. The National Rifle Association, which strongly supports individual gun ownership, is among the most potent interest groups in American politics. Other prominent groups want much stricter controls over private ownership of firearms, on the grounds they contribute to crime or are a hazard to safety.

The NRA position is that the Constitution is authoritative, and arms are needed both for personal protection and to protect the citizens against government tyranny. Many people, however, differ on the plausibility of needing personal defense, versus armed citizens deterring the military of a modern nation.

Especially in rural areas, however, citizens regard firearms as simple tools for hunting, including for the table, for sport, and for protection against both human and animal dangers. This is well-embedded into cultural tradition.

References