Recovered memory/External Links

From Citizendium
< Recovered memory
Revision as of 09:25, 18 March 2009 by imported>Gareth Leng (→‎Professional Guidelines)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
A hand-picked, annotated list of Web resources about Recovered memory.
Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner and consider archiving the URLs behind the links you provide. See also related web sources.

Skeptics

Professional Guidelines

  • 'Scientific Status of Refreshing Recollection by the Use of Hypnosis' (1985) JAMA 253: 1918-23. PMID 3974082 American Medical Association (Council on Scientific Affairs) ("The Council finds that recollections obtained during hypnosis can involve confabulations and pseudomemories and not only fail to be more accurate, but actually appear to be less reliable than nonhypnotic recall. The use of hypnosis with witnesses and victims may have serious consequences for the legal process when testimony is based on material that is elicited from a witness who has been hypnotized for the purposes of refreshing recollection.")
'Memories of Childhood Sexual Abuse'. (1994)
  • 'Statement on Memories of Sexual Abuse'. 1993
  • Questions and Answers about Memories of Childhood Abuse American Psychiatric Association ("...most leaders in the field agree that although it is a rare occurrence, a memory of early childhood abuse that has been forgotten can be remembered later. However, these leaders also agree that it is possible to construct convincing pseudomemories for events that never occurred. The mechanism(s) by which both of these phenomena happen are not well understood and, at this point it is impossible, without other corroborative evidence, to distinguish a true memory from a false one.")
  • Guidelines Relating to the Reporting of Recovered Memories. (1994) Australian Psychological Society ("Members should not avoid asking clients about the possibility of sexual or other abusive occurrences in their past, if such a question is relevant to the problem being treated. However, members should always be sensitive in the way that they ask such questions, and cautious in interpreting any response that is given. Members should not assume that a report of no abuse is necessarily indicative of either repressed or dissociated memory or denial of known events. They should neither assume that a report of abuse indicates necessarily that the client was abused; nor assume that a report of no abuse is indicative that no abuse occurred.")


  • British Psychological Societyhttp://www.forensic-centre.com/files/Memory%20and%20the%20Law.pdf Guidelines on Memory and the Law] and Guidelines for psychologists working with clients in contexts in which issues related to recovered memories may arise. (1995) ("Psychologists should avoid being drawn into a search for memories of abuse, as abused clients (and non-abused clients who are psychologically disturbed) are vulnerable and may be traumatised or overwhelmed by material that has not arisen spontaneously in the course of their psychological work. Psychologists should avoid engaging in activities and techniques which are intended to reveal indications of past sexual abuse of which the client has no memory. When psychologists use such techniques (e.g. hypnosis) for other purposes they must be aware that these techniques may make memory more confident but less reliable. Psychologists must be alert to the dangers of suggestion. Potential sources of suggestion include subtle cues about the psychologist’s attitudes and beliefs that may be inferred from the therapeutic context (e.g. particular books on the shelf) or client contact with ‘survivor literature’ and subcultures of abuse. Psychologists must be aware that there may be situations in which clients are motivated to recall memories of abuse for a variety of ends.")


  • 'Recovered Memories of Sexual Abuse: MPA Position Paper.' (1995) Michigan Psychological Association


("Developmental psychology casts doubt upon the reliability of recovered memories from early childhood. The older the child at the time of the event, the more reliable is the memory. Cognitive psychology further finds that memory is an active process of reconstruction that is susceptible to fluctuating external events and to internal effort or drives. If memories of events have not been revisited and cognitively rehearsed in the interval between the occurrence of the events and attention being paid to them some years later, it is not clear that such memories can endure, be accessible, or be reliable.")


American Psychological Association

'Working Group on Investigation of Memories of Child Abuse'. (1996)


National Association of Social Workers

'Evaluation and Treatment of Adults with the Possibility of Recovered Memories of Childhood Sexual Abuse'. (1996)


Canadian Psychological Association 'Guidelines for Psychologists Addressing Recovered Memories'. (1996)


British Association for Counselling

'False Memory Syndrome: A Statement'. (1997)


Royal College of Psychiatrists

'Reported Recovered Memories of Child Sexual Abuse'. (1997)


Scientific Advisory Board of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation

Statement.

The International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies 'Childhood Trauma Remembered: A report on the current scientific knowledge base and its applications.' (1998)


  • 'Clinical Hypnosis and Memory: Guidelines for Clinicians and for Forensic Hypnosis. (1995) American Society of Clinical HypnosisChicago: American Society of Clinical Hypnosis Press. ISBN: 1886610010