Political party: Difference between revisions
imported>Nick Gardner m (→Origins) |
imported>Nick Gardner (Policies) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Active political parties have emerged in virtually every country that has a democratic constitution (elsewhere, political parties have served mainly as passive agents of the state). | Active political parties have emerged in virtually every country that has a democratic constitution (elsewhere, political parties have served mainly as passive agents of the state). | ||
A 1967 study attributed the creation of the existing parties of the western democracies to four "''cleavages''" that had arisen from national and industrial revolutions; which were identified as ''centre versus periphery'', ''church versus state'', ''landowners versus industrialists'', and ''capitalists versus workers'' <ref>Seymour Lipset and Stein Rokkan ''Party Systems and Voter Alliances:a cross-National Perspective'' Free Press New York 1967</ref>. Subsequent research covering a range of countries, has indicated that similar party structures had persisted during the rest of the twentieth century <ref>[http://www.questia.com/read/108789140 Karvonen and Kuhnle (eds) ''Party Systems and Voter Alliances Revisited'' Routledge 2001]</ref>. The 1967 study had observed that, with a few exceptions, party structures had become "frozen" in the patterns of the 1920s but later studies indicated that, although most of those patterns had not changed, increasing signs of volatility suggested the prospect of future change <ref>[http://www.psa.ac.uk/journals/pdf/2/post_617.pdf Andrew Drummond ''Electoral Volatility and Party Decline in Western Democracies'' 1970-1995 Political Studies 2006 vol 54]</ref>. | A 1967 study attributed the creation of the existing parties of the western democracies to four "''cleavages''" that had arisen from national and industrial revolutions; which were identified as ''centre versus periphery'', ''church versus state'', ''landowners versus industrialists'', and ''capitalists versus workers'' <ref>Seymour Lipset and Stein Rokkan ''Party Systems and Voter Alliances:a cross-National Perspective'' Free Press New York 1967</ref>. Subsequent research covering a range of countries, has indicated that similar party structures had persisted during the rest of the twentieth century <ref>[http://www.questia.com/read/108789140 Karvonen and Kuhnle (eds) ''Party Systems and Voter Alliances Revisited'' Routledge 2001]</ref>. The 1967 study had observed that, with a few exceptions, party structures had become "frozen" in the patterns of the 1920s but later studies indicated that, although most of those patterns had not changed, increasing signs of volatility suggested the prospect of future change <ref>[http://www.psa.ac.uk/journals/pdf/2/post_617.pdf Andrew Drummond ''Electoral Volatility and Party Decline in Western Democracies'' 1970-1995 Political Studies 2006 vol 54]</ref>. | ||
==Policies== | |||
Although the identities of the major parties in the western democracies have remained much as they were in 1920s, their policies have undergone significant change. It has at times been possible to summarise the policy of a European party mainly in terms of left/right positions in a spectrum of alternatives. In one such spectrum, the variable has been the extent of public ownership; in others, the resources to be devoted to public services, or the redistributive effect of taxation. Recently, however, party policies have tended to be more closely definable in terms of issues such as employment protection, immigration, law-and order, and the environment <ref>[http://www.psa.ac.uk/journals/pdf/2/post_686.pdf Christoffer Green-Pedersen ''The Growing Importance of Issue Competition: The Changing Nature of Party Competition in Western Europe'' Political Studies 2007 vol3]</ref>. There has also been a substantial decline in class-related voting in Western Europe <ref> | |||
[http://www.questia.com/app/direct/SM.qst Jacques Thomassen ''The European Voter'' Oxford University Press 2005]</ref> as well as a decline in voter turn-out at elections. In the United States, policy differences between the two major parties have been less clear-cut than in Europe, with a narrower range of left/right positions and a wider range of policy issues <ref>[http://www.policyalmanac.org/ Almanac of Policy Issues (US)]</ref>, proposals on many of which, however, have had active support from minorities of both parties | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
Revision as of 13:03, 29 November 2007
Democratically-elected political parties have had the common purpose of participating in government, but they have developed differently in different countries, and their activities have had a significant bearing upon the development of domestic policies in those countries.
Origins
Active political parties have emerged in virtually every country that has a democratic constitution (elsewhere, political parties have served mainly as passive agents of the state). A 1967 study attributed the creation of the existing parties of the western democracies to four "cleavages" that had arisen from national and industrial revolutions; which were identified as centre versus periphery, church versus state, landowners versus industrialists, and capitalists versus workers [1]. Subsequent research covering a range of countries, has indicated that similar party structures had persisted during the rest of the twentieth century [2]. The 1967 study had observed that, with a few exceptions, party structures had become "frozen" in the patterns of the 1920s but later studies indicated that, although most of those patterns had not changed, increasing signs of volatility suggested the prospect of future change [3].
Policies
Although the identities of the major parties in the western democracies have remained much as they were in 1920s, their policies have undergone significant change. It has at times been possible to summarise the policy of a European party mainly in terms of left/right positions in a spectrum of alternatives. In one such spectrum, the variable has been the extent of public ownership; in others, the resources to be devoted to public services, or the redistributive effect of taxation. Recently, however, party policies have tended to be more closely definable in terms of issues such as employment protection, immigration, law-and order, and the environment [4]. There has also been a substantial decline in class-related voting in Western Europe [5] as well as a decline in voter turn-out at elections. In the United States, policy differences between the two major parties have been less clear-cut than in Europe, with a narrower range of left/right positions and a wider range of policy issues [6], proposals on many of which, however, have had active support from minorities of both parties
References
- ↑ Seymour Lipset and Stein Rokkan Party Systems and Voter Alliances:a cross-National Perspective Free Press New York 1967
- ↑ Karvonen and Kuhnle (eds) Party Systems and Voter Alliances Revisited Routledge 2001
- ↑ Andrew Drummond Electoral Volatility and Party Decline in Western Democracies 1970-1995 Political Studies 2006 vol 54
- ↑ Christoffer Green-Pedersen The Growing Importance of Issue Competition: The Changing Nature of Party Competition in Western Europe Political Studies 2007 vol3
- ↑ Jacques Thomassen The European Voter Oxford University Press 2005
- ↑ Almanac of Policy Issues (US)