Metaphor: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
Line 59: Line 59:
Most our thinking involves performing the physiological activity of conceptualizing. The verb 'to conceptualize' does not reside among the 60 or so pan-language universal semantic primitives, but the verb 'to think' does.  We understand 'thinking' on an elemental, intuitive, primitive level, with no description of its of its meaning expressive in words more simple, more fundamental than 'thinking' itself.  As we develop from infancy, we learn its meaning from the way the community we live in uses it.  Defining 'conceptualizing' non-circularly requires basing the definition on indefinable semantic primitives, of which only 'to think' fills the bill.  We may ask about the details whereby the living human organism performs the physiological activities of thinking, and we find that in many instances we need to know the details whereby the living human organism performs the physiological activity of conceptualizing.
Most our thinking involves performing the physiological activity of conceptualizing. The verb 'to conceptualize' does not reside among the 60 or so pan-language universal semantic primitives, but the verb 'to think' does.  We understand 'thinking' on an elemental, intuitive, primitive level, with no description of its of its meaning expressive in words more simple, more fundamental than 'thinking' itself.  As we develop from infancy, we learn its meaning from the way the community we live in uses it.  Defining 'conceptualizing' non-circularly requires basing the definition on indefinable semantic primitives, of which only 'to think' fills the bill.  We may ask about the details whereby the living human organism performs the physiological activities of thinking, and we find that in many instances we need to know the details whereby the living human organism performs the physiological activity of conceptualizing.


Conceptualizing provides a way of applying thinking to things, of abstracting, or reifying, the performance of the physiological activity of thinking characteristic of conceptualizing, thereby thingifying the performance of the activity, thinking that we have discovered a thing, specifically a concept.  We give concepts a life of their own, speaking of there 'being' concepts and/or of our 'having' concepts.  We should keep in mind that concepts have no reality except as abstractions, nominalizations, or reifications of physiological activities performed by human living systems applying thinking to material and non-material things.
Conceptualizing provides a way of applying thinking to things, of abstracting, or reifying, the performance of the physiological activity of thinking characteristic of conceptualizing, thereby thingifying the active process of conceptualing, thinking that we have discovered a thing, specifically a concept.  We give concepts a life of their own, speaking of there 'being' concepts and/or of our 'having' concepts.  We should keep in mind that concepts have no reality except as abstractions, nominalizations, or reifications of physiological activities performed by human living systems applying thinking to material and non-material things.


For example, we apply thinking to tangible valuable resources, things like money.  We conceptualize money, developing it as a concept. The concept of money as a valuable resource becomes a familiar one, a concept that informs the activities of our daily lives. When we come to a point when we want to apply thinking to something less tangible, time, say, our experiences with money and time lead to a creative insight, that the two have something in common, both valuables resources. We develop a theme, <small caps>time is money</small caps>.
For example, we apply thinking to tangible valuable resources, things like money.  We conceptualize money, developing it as a concept. The concept of money as a valuable resource becomes a familiar one, a concept that informs the activities of our daily lives. When we come to a point when we want to apply thinking to something less tangible, time, say, our experiences with money and time lead to a creative insight, that the two have something in common, both valuable resources. We develop a theme, <small>TIME IS MONEY</small>, <small>TIME IS A VALUABLE RESOURCE</small>, often unconsciously.  Cognitive linguists refer to such themes as 'conceptual metaphors'. The source, or vehicle, <small>VALUABLE RESOURCE</small>, as  a linguistic metaphorical expression, carries or transfers its concept over to the target, or topic, <small>TIME</small>. Whereas the conceptual metaphor, the conceptual metaphorical theme, may remain unconscious, it reveals its presence &mdash; in the way we conceptualize time:
 
* "Doing it that way will cost you time."
* "We're wasting time procrastinating like this"
* "We can save time if we take this route."
* "A stitch in time saves nine."
* "I don't have the time to give you right now."
* "I will pay for your time."


==References and notes cited in text as superscripts==
==References and notes cited in text as superscripts==

Revision as of 11:54, 10 November 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Addendum [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

As an expression in speech or writing, a metaphor directs the mind of the listener or reader to think about some particular thing similar or analogous to the metaphor's literal meaning, as a mountain of paperwork prompts the listener/reader to think about a large pile of papers requiring processing, implying perhaps the difficult job ahead getting on top of pile, or, to use another metaphor, the difficult job of whittling the pile down to a flat plain. Metaphors extend beyond their literal meaning, often into the realm of ideas and action.

Metaphors can serve a variety of functions:

  • to add stylistic or poetic flourish to language, as when William Shakespeare, in sonnet XVIII, refers to the sun as the eye of heaven and writes of variations in sunny days in terms of the state of the sun's gold complexion;
  • to express what we experience in rich and vivid language, which, through its emotional impact, often promotes the communicative goals of metaphor described in the following bullets,[1] just one of the miracles of metaphor;
  • to express a thought in familiar and compact terms that to express literally would require more elaborate, intricate, convoluted, or elusive language,[1] as when scientists refer to DNA as the blueprint of the cell, or as the database the cell uses to construct itself and function in particular ways;[2]
  • to enhance the listener/reader's ability to grasp an unfamiliar or difficult-to-grasp concept using a more familiar concept, as when cognitive scientists refer to the mind as a machine, as a telephone switchboard, or as a network, or to a biological cell as a miniature factory;
  • to accomplish that same pedagogical goal using a constructed fictional, sometimes fantastical, novel concept, as when Kosslyn and Koenig, in their book, Wet Mind: The New Cognitive Neuroscience,[3] construct a fictional scenario of rows of octopi unknowingling generating information output about local fish density to overhead seagulls through interactions of their tentacles, a metaphor they constructed to explain the nature and operation of a connectionist neural network;[4]
  • to influence the frame or cast of mind of the listener/reader regarding something,[5] as when politicians use expressions such as right to life, war on terror, and surge.

Those functions of metaphor are elaborated upon in:[1] [5] [6]  [7]  [8]

Metaphor is for most people a device of the poetic imagination and the rhetorical flourish-a matter of extraordinary rather than ordinary language. Moreover, metaphor is typically viewed as characteristic of language alone, a matter of words rather than thought or action....We have found, on the contrary, that metaphor is pervasive in everyday life, not just in language but in thought and action. — George Lakoff and Mark Johnson[6]

Often the literal meaning of the metaphorical expression gives a concrete or familiar or readily visualized image — the 'source' — whereas often the referent of the metaphor — the 'target' — is more abstract.[6]  [7]  [8]  When Shakespeare´s depressed Macbeth laments, "And all our yesterdays have lighted fools / The way to dusty death", he does not refer literally to a lighted pathway leading to a destination of oblivion, but instead refers to something different, something more abstract, something related to the futility of life and the inevitability of death, more specifically perhaps to our past as a journey that we traveled foolishly, futilely, only to arrive at death as our final destination.

Metaphors then require the listener/reader to render an interpretation of the intended comparison, or transfer, of source to target, an interpretation of how the metaphorical expression maps to the intended target. In context, Macbeth's "Out, out brief candle" invites the listener/reader to interpret the brief life of a candle's flame as the brief period the flame of life burns in a human being, as mapping a burning candle to a living (combusting) human.

This article discusses, among other things, the reasons we so frequently employ metaphor in speech and writing, why it is, as George Lakoff and Mark Johnson state in the accompanying textbox, "....that metaphor is pervasive in everyday life, not just in language but in thought and action."

Historical theories of metaphor

Metaphor as style in speech and writing

Viewed as an aspect of speech and writing, metaphor qualifies as style, in particular, style characterized by a type of analogy. An expression (word, phrase) that by implication suggests the likeness of one entity to another entity gives style to an item of speech or writing, whether the entities consist of objects, events, ideas, activities, attributes, or almost anything expressible in language. For example, in the first sentence of this paragraph, the word ´viewed´ serves as a metaphor for ´thought of´, implying analogy of the process of seeing and the thought process. The phrase, "viewed as an aspect of", projects the properties of seeing (vision) something from a particular perspective onto thinking about something from a particular perspective, that ´something´ in this case referring to ´metaphor´ and that ´perspective´ in this case referring to the characteristics of speech and writing.

As a characteristic of speech and writing, metaphors can serve the poetic imagination, enabling William Shakespeare, in his play "As You Like It", to compare the world to a stage and its human inhabitants players entering and exiting upon that stage; [9] enabling Sylvia Plath, in her poem "Cut", to compare the blood issuing from her cut thumb to the running of a million soldiers, "redcoats, every one";[10] and, enabling Robert Frost, in "The Road Not Taken", to compare one´s life to a journey. [11]

Viewed also as an aspect of speech and writing, metaphor can serve as a device for persuading the listener or reader of the speaker-writer´s argument or thesis, the so-called rhetorical metaphor....

Metaphor as foundational to our conceptual system

Cognitive linguists emphasize that metaphors serve to facilitate the understanding of one conceptual domain, typically an abstract one like 'life' or 'theories' or 'ideas', through expressions that relate to another, more familiar conceptual domain, typically a more concrete one like 'journey' or 'buildings' or 'food'. [6] [8] Food for thought: we devour a book of raw facts, try to digest them, stew over them, let them simmer on the back-burner, regurgitate them in discussions, cook up explanations, hoping they do not seem half-baked. Theories as buildings: we establish a foundation for them, a framework, support them with strong arguments, buttressing them with facts, hoping they will stand. Life as journey: some of us travel hopefully, others seem to have no direction, many lose their way.

A convenient short-hand way of capturing this view of metaphor is the following: CONCEPTUAL DOMAIN (A) IS CONCEPTUAL DOMAIN (B), which is what is called a conceptual metaphor. A conceptual metaphor consists of two conceptual domains, in which one domain is understood in terms of another. A conceptual domain is any coherent organization of experience. Thus, for example, we have coherently organized knowledge about journeys that we rely on in understanding life.[8]

How does this relate to the nature and importance of our conceptual system, and to metaphor as foundational to our conceptual system?

  Nature and importance of our conceptual system

Our conceptual system comprises a system of concepts. The word 'concept' nominalizes a physiological activity, namely that of conceptualizing, a physiological activity performed by the human living organism. Thus our conceptual system comprises the system whereby we perform the physiological activities of conceptualizing.

Conceptualizing targets things, we conceptualize about things, things fall under the processes whereby we conceptualize them. We conceptualize about material things — books, stars, people — and non-material things — love, beauty, happiness, time.

Most our thinking involves performing the physiological activity of conceptualizing. The verb 'to conceptualize' does not reside among the 60 or so pan-language universal semantic primitives, but the verb 'to think' does. We understand 'thinking' on an elemental, intuitive, primitive level, with no description of its of its meaning expressive in words more simple, more fundamental than 'thinking' itself. As we develop from infancy, we learn its meaning from the way the community we live in uses it. Defining 'conceptualizing' non-circularly requires basing the definition on indefinable semantic primitives, of which only 'to think' fills the bill. We may ask about the details whereby the living human organism performs the physiological activities of thinking, and we find that in many instances we need to know the details whereby the living human organism performs the physiological activity of conceptualizing.

Conceptualizing provides a way of applying thinking to things, of abstracting, or reifying, the performance of the physiological activity of thinking characteristic of conceptualizing, thereby thingifying the active process of conceptualing, thinking that we have discovered a thing, specifically a concept. We give concepts a life of their own, speaking of there 'being' concepts and/or of our 'having' concepts. We should keep in mind that concepts have no reality except as abstractions, nominalizations, or reifications of physiological activities performed by human living systems applying thinking to material and non-material things.

For example, we apply thinking to tangible valuable resources, things like money. We conceptualize money, developing it as a concept. The concept of money as a valuable resource becomes a familiar one, a concept that informs the activities of our daily lives. When we come to a point when we want to apply thinking to something less tangible, time, say, our experiences with money and time lead to a creative insight, that the two have something in common, both valuable resources. We develop a theme, TIME IS MONEY, TIME IS A VALUABLE RESOURCE, often unconsciously. Cognitive linguists refer to such themes as 'conceptual metaphors'. The source, or vehicle, VALUABLE RESOURCE, as a linguistic metaphorical expression, carries or transfers its concept over to the target, or topic, TIME. Whereas the conceptual metaphor, the conceptual metaphorical theme, may remain unconscious, it reveals its presence — in the way we conceptualize time:

  • "Doing it that way will cost you time."
  • "We're wasting time procrastinating like this"
  • "We can save time if we take this route."
  • "A stitch in time saves nine."
  • "I don't have the time to give you right now."
  • "I will pay for your time."

References and notes cited in text as superscripts

Most citations to articles listed here include links — in font-color blue — to full-text. Accessing full-text may require personal or institutional subscription. Nevertheless, many with do offer full-text, and if not, usually offer text or links that show the abstracts of the articles, free without subscription. Links to books variously may open to full-text, or to the publishers' description of the book with or without downloadable selected chapters, reviews, and table of contents. Books with links to Google Books often offer extensive previews of the books' text.


  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Ortony, A. (1975). Why metaphors are necessary and not just nice. Educational Theory, 25, 45–53.
  2. Strauss S. (2009) We need a satisfactory metaphor for DNA. New Scientist Issue 2696. 23-Feb-2009
    • Scientists continue to search for the apposite metaphor that can give a student or non-scientist a realistic way to think about DNA. Other linguistic metaphorical expressions for DNA:
      • Chemical building block; Alphabet of life; Book of life; Computer code of life; Symphony of life; The web that spins the spider. Trevor Spencer Rines, who invented that last metaphor, explains: "If you look at a DNA molecule down its axis it looks like a spider web; then again, the idea of the molecule that unzips itself and puts itself back together reminded me of spiders consuming their own web and then re-spinning it." Strauss comments: "As our understanding of DNA has matured, the idea of a molecule that is both the spinner and the spun now seems perfectly apt."
  3. Kosslyn SM, Koenig O. (1995) Wet Mind: The New Cognitive Neuroscience. Free Press: New York. ISBN 0028740858 (pbk). | Reviews of Book on Amazon | Google Books Preview
  4. Wee L. (2005) Constructing the source: metaphor as a discourse strategy. Discourse Studies 7:363-384.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Lakoff G. (2008) The Political Mind: Why You Can't Understand 21st-Century Politics with an 18th-Century Brain. Viking: The Penguin Group. ISBN 9780670019274
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Lakoff G., Johnson M. (1980, 2003) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. New paperback printing with 2003 Afterword by authors. ISBN 0226468011.
    • From the publisher's synopsis: Metaphor, the authors explain, is a fundamental mechanism of mind, one that allows us to use what we know about our physical and social experience to provide understanding of countless other subjects. Because such metaphors structure our most basic understandings of our experience, they are "metaphors we live by"-metaphors that can shape our perceptions and actions without our ever noticing them....In this updated (2003) edition...the authors supply an afterword surveying how their theory of metaphor has developed within the cognitive sciences to become central to the contemporary understanding of how we think and how we express our thoughts in language.
    • Author Biographies by Publisher: George Lakoff is a professor in the Department of Linguistics at the University of California, Berkeley. He is the author of, among other books, Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things and Moral Politics, both published by the University of Chicago Press. Mark Johnson is the Knight Professor of Liberal Arts and Sciences at the University of Oregon. He is the author of The Body in the Mind and Moral Imagination, both published by the University of Chicago Press. Johnson and Lakoff have also coauthored Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Knowles M, Moon R. (2006) Introducing Metaphor Routledge. ISBN 9780415278003. | Google Books Limited Preview
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Zoltán Kövecses. (2002) Metaphor: a practical introduction. Oxford University Press US. ISBN 9780195145113.
  9. "As You Like It": Entire play From: The Complete Works of William Shakespeare
  10. "Cut" by Sylvia Plath From: The Sylvia Plath Forum
  11. "The Road Not Taken" by Robert Frost From: Bartleby.com: Great Books Online