Magnaporthe grisea

From Citizendium
Revision as of 13:09, 17 April 2009 by imported>Shridevi singh (→‎References)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.
All unapproved Citizendium articles may contain errors of fact, bias, grammar etc. A version of an article is unapproved unless it is marked as citable with a dedicated green template at the top of the page, as in this version of the 'Biology' article. Citable articles are intended to be of reasonably high quality. The participants in the Citizendium project make no representations about the reliability of Citizendium articles or, generally, their suitability for any purpose.

Attention niels epting.png
Attention niels epting.png
This article is currently being developed as part of an Eduzendium student project in the framework of a course entitled Microbiology 201 at Queens College, CUNY. The course homepage can be found at CZ:Biol 201: General Microbiology.
For the course duration, the article is closed to outside editing. Of course you can always leave comments on the discussion page. The anticipated date of course completion is May 21, 2009. One month after that date at the latest, this notice shall be removed.
Besides, many other Citizendium articles welcome your collaboration!


Magnaporthe grisea

A conidium and conidiogenous cell of M. grisea

Magnaporthe grisea.jpg
Scientific classification
Kingdom: fungi
Phylum: Ascomycota
Class: Sordariomycetes
Order: Incertae sedis
Family: Magnaporthaceae
Genus: Magnaporthe
Species: M.grisea
Binomial name
Magnaporthe grisea


Description and significance

Magnaporthe grisea, a plant-pathogenic fungus, is the causal agent of rice blast disease which is one of the greatest pathological threats to rice crops. It was thought to be localized only in developing nations, however for the past decade it has emerged as a severe problem in the United States, more recently in California. Yearly, rice that can feed an estimated 60 million people is destroyed by this disease. M.grisea is a well adapted fungus that can attack and penetrate its host plant with ease. More importantly, this fungus can also infect other important agricultures such as cereals, wheat, rye, pearl millet, and barley. The disease that is cause is then referred as blight disease or blast disease. Furthermore, M.grisea is thought of as a model organism in studies of fungal phytopathogenicity and host-parasite interactions.

A typical eye-shaped lesion of rice blast disease on a U.S. rice cultivar that was inoculated with M.grisea.

Genome structure

Due to the destructive nature of this pathogen, sequencing the entire genome was necessary to understand the mechanisms of how the fungus causes disease. The complete genome of M.grisea was sequenced in 2005. M. grisea is a haploid and consists of ~40 Mb that are contained in 7 chromosomes.[1] [2] The genome consists of a varied group of secreted proteins and a range of G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) genes. Furthermore, strong phylogenetic evidence of horizontal gene transfer (HGT) has been found between M.grisea (ascomycete fungi) and oomycetes ( a distant relative).

Cell structure and metabolism

Magnaporthe grisea is a filamentous fungi. The spore tips contains a spore tip mucilage (STM) adhesive that allows M.grisea to bind to its host. The binding of the spore begins the infection progression. After host-binding, specialized infection cells termed appresoria provide mechanical force and thus penetrates the plant cuticle and so gain entry into the internal tissues of the host.

M.grisea are infectious species and so obtain nutrients from their hosts. M.grisea is haploid and can reproduce sexually and asexually. M.grisea infectiious life cycle is asexual. The conidium is the infectious structure in this life cycle. After colonization of its host, lesions form. The lesions sites are locations of M.grisea sporulation. Soon enough, nearby plants become infected as well and so the spread of rice blast disease.

Ecology

M.grisea inhibits the host plant’s immune system, affecting the metabolism and cell signaling pathways. Adaptation of M.grisea is so efficient that even rice cultivars (bred to resist the disease) are infected. All above-ground parts of a host plant can be infected, but only if the stem, node, or panicle becomes infected will the grain set be lost. Rice is one of the most important staple food worldwide and control of this disease is utmost important.

Life Cycle

Life history of Magnaporthe grisea. "The Genome Sequence of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe grisea" (dean et al. 2005)

Pathology

M.grisea produces conidia spores that become airborne and so land on rice plants. The spores are adhesive and stick to the plant. Germination is then followed and a specialized structure called the appresorium penetrates the plant surface. High nitrogen content, host plant moisture, and 20°C of night temperatures favors the disease. There are many races of this fungal pathogen and their level of virulence varies. Rice cultivars have been bred with the different resistance genes that have been identified, however the pathogen overcomes the resistance genes within a few years.

Control Measures

Burning/composting of diseased tissues

Diseased plants are burned or composted to prevent the spread of the disease to the next crop season.

Healthy Crop

For a healthy crop, healthy seeds are necessary and many precautions are to be taken. The seeds are collected from the field where M.grisea existence is unlikely due to hostile conditions for the pathogen. Fungicide and disinfectants are then applied if necessary for protection against a variety of pathogens.

Fertilizer management

Excess nitrogen fertilizer can facilitate the disease progression, whereas silica limits the development of the disease. The amount and type of fertilizer are to be discretionally applied.

Chemical control

The following fungicides are applied to combat the rice blast disease: benomyl, fthalide, edifenphos, iprobenfos, tricyclazole, isoprothiolane, probenazole, pyroquilon, felimzone(= meferimzone), diclocymet, carpropamid, fenoxanil and metominostrobin, and antibiotics such as blasticidin and kasugamycin.

Resistant cultivars

Based on studies and current knowledge of the different races of M.grisea, resistant cultivars have been bred throughout the world.

Current Research

healthy rice stalk.

"The Genome Sequence of the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe Grisea"

-This study was conducted to sequence the whole genome of M.grisea. Presented in this paper are preliminary analyses of the genome. The genome was sequenced via a shotgun approach. The draft genome sequenced consists of 2.273 sequence contigs that are longer than 2kbs. Total length of the genome is estimated to be ~40Mb. 11,109 genes are predicted to yield protein products and make up 48% of M.grisea genome. Evidently, phylogenitically none of the gene families of M.grisea shows recent lineage-specific expansion indicating that ancient gene duplication may have played a role followed by loss of the gene families in the other lineages.It is found that M.grisea has a considerable amount of proteins that are diverse and novel in cell pathways. Furthermore, the generation of genetic variations are tremendous and could explain the efficiency of this fungal pathogen to infect resistant rice cultivars within a few generations.

"Cellular Differentiation and Host Invasion by the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe grisea"

-Current advances towards the understanding of the rice blast fungus are described in this article. The recent sequence of the genome provided much insight into the structure and amount of genes that are required to cause the rice blast disease. Phylogenetic analysis provided evidence for multiple horizontal gene transfers. There is also a better understanding of the early stages of plant infections. Appresoria are the specialized structures that infect the plants. M.grisea can also infect the host plant roots. Within the roots, the fungus then can invade the vascular system and ultimately kill the plant. Furthermore, functional genomics studies have led to the discovery of ~200 genes that are essential for the rice blast disease. It is to be noted that though equipped with much knowledge of the biology of M.grisea, there are impediments to overcome.

"Roles for Rice Membrane Dynamics and Plasmodesmata during Biotrophic Invasion by the Blast Fungus"

-This paper investigates the way M.grisea grows with the plant cells. The penetration peg of the appresorium pierces the host plants surface. The cytoplasm of the peg contains abundant actin microfilaments that extend in the lumen of the plants epidermal cell. This extension then facilitates the movement of the appresorium nucleus and cytoplasmic contents. This primary growing hyphae then differentiates into an invasive hyphae (IH) that will progress unto neighboring cells. Three distinct types of hyphae that plays a role in biotrophic invasion has been identified in this paper: (1) filamentous primary hyphae in the first-invaded plant cell; (2) bulbous IH in first-invaded and in subsequently invaded plant cells; and (3) filamentous IH that initially grow in successively invaded cells. Additionally, supportive evidence is provided in regards to the cell-to-cell movement of the blast IH with the use of plasmodesmata. This is quite a significant discovery because most viruses are known to move this way which are considerably smaller than the M.grisea.

References

  • N. J. Talbot, D. J. Ebbole, and J. E. Hamer

Identification and Characterization of MPG1, a Gene Involved in Pathogenicity from the Rice Blast Fungus Magnaporthe grisea The Plant Cell, Vol. 5, 1575-1590, November 1993 American Society of Plant Physiologists

  • Silvia V. Diaz-Perez , V. Wayne Crouch and Marc J. Orbach

Construction and Characterization of aMagnaporthe griseaBacterial Artificial Chromosome Library Fungal Genetics & Biology Volume 20, Issue 4, December 1996, Pages 280-288

  1. Talbot et al. 1993
  2. Orbach 1996