Journal impact factor/Bibliography: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen (+one) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (+one) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
*{{CZ:Ref:Neylon 2009 Article-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact}} | *{{CZ:Ref:Neylon 2009 Article-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact}} | ||
*{{CZ:Ref:Archambault 2009 History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences}} | |||
*[http://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/IMU/Report/CitationStatistics.pdf Citation Statistics] - A report published in 2008 by the [http://www.mathunion.org/ International Mathematical Union] on the use of citation statistics, particularly the Impact factor. | *[http://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/IMU/Report/CitationStatistics.pdf Citation Statistics] - A report published in 2008 by the [http://www.mathunion.org/ International Mathematical Union] on the use of citation statistics, particularly the Impact factor. | ||
Latest revision as of 10:35, 18 November 2009
- Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
- Neylon C, Wu S (2009) Article-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact. PLoS Biol 7(11): e1000242. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000242
- Éric Archambault and Vincent Larivière (2009). "History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences". Scientometrics 79 (3): 635-649. DOI:10.1007/s11192-007-2036-x. Research Blogging. [e]
- Citation Statistics - A report published in 2008 by the International Mathematical Union on the use of citation statistics, particularly the Impact factor.