Galois theory: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ragnar Schroder
imported>Meg Taylor
m (spelling: fullfilled -> fulfilled)
 
(24 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
==Introduction==  
==Introduction==  


Galois expressed his theory in terms of polynomials and [[complex number|complex numbers]],  today Galois theory is usually formulated using general [[Field theory (Mathematics)|field theory]].
Galois expressed his theory in terms of polynomials and [[complex number|complex numbers]],  today Galois theory is usually formulated using general [[Field theory (mathematics)|field theory]].


Key concepts are [[Field extension|field extensions]] and [[Group theory|groups]],  which should be thoroughly understood before Galois theory can be properly studied.
Key concepts are [[Field extension|field extensions]] and [[Group theory|groups]],  which should be thoroughly understood before Galois theory can be properly studied.
Line 15: Line 15:
==Basic summary of Galois theory==  
==Basic summary of Galois theory==  


The core idea behind Galois theory is that given a polynomial <math>\alpha</math> with coefficients in a field K (typically the rational numbers),  there exists  
The core idea behind Galois theory is that given a polynomial ''f'' with coefficients in a field ''K'' (typically the rational numbers),  there exists  
*a smallest possible field L that contains K (or a field [[isomorphic]] to K) as a subfield and also all the roots of <math>\alpha</math>.  This field is known as the extension of K by the roots of <math>\alpha</math>.
*a smallest possible field ''L'' that contains ''K'' (or a field [[field isomorphism|isomorphic]] to ''K'') as a subfield and also all the roots of ''f''.  This field is known as the [[field extension|extension]] of ''K'' by the roots of ''f'', or the ''[[splitting field]]'' of ''f'' over ''K''.  It is unique up to isomorphism..
*a collection of similarly defined intermediate fields, each containing a unique subset of the roots.
*a collection of similarly defined intermediate fields, each containing a unique subset of the roots.
*a group containing all [[automorphisms]] in L that leave the elements in K untouched - the Galois group of the polynomial <math>\alpha</math>.  
*a group containing all [[field automorphism]]s in ''L'' that leave the elements in ''K'' untouched - the Galois group of the polynomial ''f''.  


Providing certain technicalities are fullfilled,  the structure of this group contains information about the nature of the roots, and whether the equation <math>\alpha = 0</math> has solutions expressible as a finite formula involving   only ordinary arithmetical operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division and rational powers) on the coefficients.
Providing certain technicalities are fulfilled,  the structure of this group contains information about the nature of the roots, and whether the equation <math>f = 0</math> has solutions expressible as a finite formula involving only ordinary arithmetical operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division and rational powers) on the coefficients.


This connection between the Galois group and collection of extension fields is known as the [[Galois connection]].
This connection between the Galois group and collection of extension fields is known as the [[Galois connection]].


{{Image|galoistheorypic3.gif|right|300px|Example illustration of a base field K, large field L and some intermediate fields, with inclusion graph.  Here K &sub; M1 &sub; M3 &sub; L and K &sub; M2 &sub; M4 &sub; L.}}


===The Galois group of a polynomial - a basic example===  
==The Galois connection==
 
Given a Galois group G we may look for all its subgroups.  These subgroups again contain subgroups.  This structure is naturally represented by a [[directed graph]].
 
The collection of intermediate fields may also be represented by such a graph.  When the Galois correspondence exists,  these graphs are [[isomorphism|isomorphic]]. 
 
 
===The Galois group of a polynomial - a trivial example===  


As an example,  let us look at the second-degree polynomial <math>x^2-5</math>, with the coefficients {-5,0,1} viewed as elements of Q.  
As an example,  let us look at the second-degree polynomial <math>x^2-5</math>, with the coefficients {-5,0,1} viewed as elements of Q.  
Line 31: Line 39:
This polynomial has no roots in Q.  However, from the [[fundamental theorem of algebra]] we know that it has exacly two roots in C, and can be written as the product of two first-degree polynomials there - i.e. <math>x^2-5 = (x-r_0)(x-r_1), r_0, r_1 \in  C</math>.  From direct inspection of the polynomial we also realize that <math>r_0 = -r_1</math>.
This polynomial has no roots in Q.  However, from the [[fundamental theorem of algebra]] we know that it has exacly two roots in C, and can be written as the product of two first-degree polynomials there - i.e. <math>x^2-5 = (x-r_0)(x-r_1), r_0, r_1 \in  C</math>.  From direct inspection of the polynomial we also realize that <math>r_0 = -r_1</math>.


We now look for the smallest subfield of C that contains Q and both <math>r_0</math> and <math>-r_0</math>, which is L = { <math>   a+b r_0, a,b \in Q  </math>  }.  Since <math>r_0^2 = 5 \in Q</math>,  all products and sums are well defined.  This field is then the smallest extension of Q by the roots of <math>\alpha</math>.
Using ordinary algebra and the identity <math>r_0^2 = r_1^2= 5</math>, it is quite easy to show that L = <math>\lbrace a+b r_0, a,b \in Q  \rbrace </math> is the smallest subfield of C that contains Q and both roots.
 


Now, in order to find the Galois group,  we need to look at all possible automorphisms of L that leave every elements of Q alone.
The are exactly 2 automorphisms of L that leave every element of Q alone: the do-nothing automorphism <math>\phi_0: a+b r_0  \rightarrow a + b r_0 </math> and the map <math>\phi_1 : a+b r_0  \rightarrow a - b r_0</math>.


The only such automorphisms are the null automorphism and the map <math>a+b r_0  \rightarrow a - b r_0</math>.
Under composition of automorphisms,  these two automorphisms together form a group  isomorphic to <math>S_2</math>,  the group of permutations of two objects.


Under composition of automorphisms,  these two automorphisms together are isomorphic to the group <math>S_2</math>, the group of permutations of two objects.
The sought for Galois group is therefore <math>S_2</math>, which has no nontrivial subgroups.


The sought for Galois group is therefore <math>S_2</math>.
It can be shown that in this case the Galois correspondence exists, so we may conclude from the subgroup structure of <math>S_2</math> that there is no intermediate subfield of L containing Q and also roots of the polynomial.


==See also==
==See also==

Latest revision as of 22:17, 7 February 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.


Galois theory is an area of mathematical study that originated with Evariste Galois around 1830, as part of an effort to understand the relationships between the roots of polynomials, in particular why there are no simple formulas for extracting the roots of the general polynomial of fifth (or higher) degree.


Introduction

Galois expressed his theory in terms of polynomials and complex numbers, today Galois theory is usually formulated using general field theory.

Key concepts are field extensions and groups, which should be thoroughly understood before Galois theory can be properly studied.


Basic summary of Galois theory

The core idea behind Galois theory is that given a polynomial f with coefficients in a field K (typically the rational numbers), there exists

  • a smallest possible field L that contains K (or a field isomorphic to K) as a subfield and also all the roots of f. This field is known as the extension of K by the roots of f, or the splitting field of f over K. It is unique up to isomorphism..
  • a collection of similarly defined intermediate fields, each containing a unique subset of the roots.
  • a group containing all field automorphisms in L that leave the elements in K untouched - the Galois group of the polynomial f.

Providing certain technicalities are fulfilled, the structure of this group contains information about the nature of the roots, and whether the equation has solutions expressible as a finite formula involving only ordinary arithmetical operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division and rational powers) on the coefficients.

This connection between the Galois group and collection of extension fields is known as the Galois connection.

PD Image
Example illustration of a base field K, large field L and some intermediate fields, with inclusion graph. Here K ⊂ M1 ⊂ M3 ⊂ L and K ⊂ M2 ⊂ M4 ⊂ L.

The Galois connection

Given a Galois group G we may look for all its subgroups. These subgroups again contain subgroups. This structure is naturally represented by a directed graph.

The collection of intermediate fields may also be represented by such a graph. When the Galois correspondence exists, these graphs are isomorphic.


The Galois group of a polynomial - a trivial example

As an example, let us look at the second-degree polynomial , with the coefficients {-5,0,1} viewed as elements of Q.

This polynomial has no roots in Q. However, from the fundamental theorem of algebra we know that it has exacly two roots in C, and can be written as the product of two first-degree polynomials there - i.e. . From direct inspection of the polynomial we also realize that .

Using ordinary algebra and the identity , it is quite easy to show that L = is the smallest subfield of C that contains Q and both roots.

The are exactly 2 automorphisms of L that leave every element of Q alone: the do-nothing automorphism and the map .

Under composition of automorphisms, these two automorphisms together form a group isomorphic to , the group of permutations of two objects.

The sought for Galois group is therefore , which has no nontrivial subgroups.

It can be shown that in this case the Galois correspondence exists, so we may conclude from the subgroup structure of that there is no intermediate subfield of L containing Q and also roots of the polynomial.

See also


Related topics


References

External links