Compellence: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
imported>Caesar Schinas
m (Robot: Changing template: TOC-right)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
{{TOC-right}}
{{TOC|right}}
'''Compellence''' is a set of actions or positions that force an opponent to take some action desired by the initial actor. It is the opposite of [[deterrence]], in which the actions are intended to prevent an opponent from taking some action.  It is compellence when the classic lawman threatens a suspect with death if he does not surrrender; it is deterrence that inhibits the offender from initiating the action that would draw suspicion.
'''Compellence''' is a set of actions or positions that force an opponent to take some action desired by the initial actor. It is the opposite of [[deterrence]], in which the actions are intended to prevent an opponent from taking some action.  It is compellence when the classic lawman threatens a suspect with death if he does not surrrender; it is deterrence that inhibits the offender from initiating the action that would draw suspicion.



Revision as of 06:25, 31 May 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Definition [?]
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Compellence is a set of actions or positions that force an opponent to take some action desired by the initial actor. It is the opposite of deterrence, in which the actions are intended to prevent an opponent from taking some action. It is compellence when the classic lawman threatens a suspect with death if he does not surrrender; it is deterrence that inhibits the offender from initiating the action that would draw suspicion.

The term is often attributed to Thomas Schelling:

There is typically a difference between a threat intended to make an adversary do something and a threat intended to keep him from starting something. The distinction is in the timing in who has to make the first move, and whose initiative is put to the test.[1]

Legal

As opposed to issuing a restraining order, a court may issue a writ of mandamus, ordering a party to take some actions.

Geostrategic actions

While much of the Vietnam War used variants of deterrence, Operation LINEBACKER II used a compellence model to force the North Vietnamese to return to the Paris Peace Talks.

References

  1. Schelling, Thomas (1963), The Strategy of Conflict, Harvard University Press, p. 195