CZ Talk:Biology Workgroup/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Thomas E Kelly
imported>Thomas E Kelly
mNo edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
==large intestine or colon/rectum?==
==large intestine or colon/rectum?==
After scanning this list, 3 words jumped out at me relating to the GI tract.  While it is important to have articles when people type in Large Intestine and Small Intestine, I think it is important to add more anatomical words to these articles with links to the articles written on the colon, etc.  I rarely think of the "large intestine," but which part of the colon has the problem.  After elementary school, how often do you use the word "large intestine?" I may be completely biased after many years of science education but I feel like people start using word like colon and rectum a lot earlier than we think.  In general, general articles should be FULL of links to specific articles.  General articles should be written at a lower reading level than anatomical articles, however, these general articles must contain links to more scientific articles relating to the issue.  Don't underestimate the ability of readers to figure out what words mean, so try write articles at an easy to read, yet with advanced vocabulary (linked). {{User|Thomas E Kelly}}
After scanning this list, 3 words jumped out at me relating to the GI tract.  While it is important to have articles when people type in Large Intestine and Small Intestine, I think it is important to add more anatomical words to these articles with links to the articles written on the colon, etc.  I rarely think of the "large intestine," but which part of the colon has the problem.  After elementary school, how often do you use the word "large intestine?" I may be completely biased after many years of science education but I feel like people start using word like colon and rectum a lot earlier than we think.  In general, general articles should be FULL of links to specific articles.  General articles should be written at a lower reading level than anatomical articles, however, these general articles must contain links to more scientific articles relating to the issue.  Don't underestimate the ability of readers to figure out what words mean, so try write articles at an easy to read, yet with advanced vocabulary (linked). {{User|Thomas E Kelly}}
 
:Edit- I still use "large-" and "small intestine" weekly - I was exaggerating quite a bit. {{User|Thomas E Kelly}}
Edit- I still use "large-" and "small intestine" weekly - I was exaggerating quite a bit. {{User|Thomas E Kelly}}

Revision as of 22:29, 10 December 2006

I suggest that most of the articles on specific organs and specific animals not be considered as top priority articles. There are just too many,DavidGoodman 23:17, 24 November 2006 (CST)

I think this is a good point. What level do you think we should attempt to cover with respect to animals; stopping at the level of mammal (as currently written in the zoology section)? Instead of all the plant hormones have one introductory article? Subcellular components are important enough to have their own artilces in my opinon. Why don't we start pruning down by striking out the ones we think are too general? At least this way we can see the updated list and easuily visualise what is being cut out. Chris Day (Talk) 03:35, 25 November 2006 (CST)
Since it will be considerably harder to edit the general articles, I've revised this to a mix, indicated in bold, taking into account t what the people here already have said the want to do, and having blocks of articles.Just a suggestion to think about. DavidGoodman 01:03, 26 November 2006 (CST)
David, is there a distinction between the italicized and bold articles in your last series of edits? Chris Day (Talk) 00:58, 27 November 2006 (CST)
Sorry, I had meant to change them all to bold, and have now done soDavidGoodman 16:54, 27 November 2006 (CST).

now all we need is writers

large intestine or colon/rectum?

After scanning this list, 3 words jumped out at me relating to the GI tract. While it is important to have articles when people type in Large Intestine and Small Intestine, I think it is important to add more anatomical words to these articles with links to the articles written on the colon, etc. I rarely think of the "large intestine," but which part of the colon has the problem. After elementary school, how often do you use the word "large intestine?" I may be completely biased after many years of science education but I feel like people start using word like colon and rectum a lot earlier than we think. In general, general articles should be FULL of links to specific articles. General articles should be written at a lower reading level than anatomical articles, however, these general articles must contain links to more scientific articles relating to the issue. Don't underestimate the ability of readers to figure out what words mean, so try write articles at an easy to read, yet with advanced vocabulary (linked). User general information template

User workgroup information template

See CZ:Userinfo System for usage instructions.

Edit- I still use "large-" and "small intestine" weekly - I was exaggerating quite a bit. User general information template

User workgroup information template

See CZ:Userinfo System for usage instructions.