CZ:Featured article/Current: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chunbum Park
imported>Chunbum Park
Line 1: Line 1:
== '''[[Ukiyo-e]]''' ==
== '''[[Subjective-objective dichotomy]]''' ==
----
----
'''Ukiyo-e''' (浮世絵 ''ukiyoe'') is a form of [[Japan]]ese visual [[art]], both with its own intrinsic beauty, but also reflecting social systems of the Tokugawa or [[Edo Period]]s (1615-1868). It also extended artistic technique, including the printing of art books to make it more accessible to the wealthy, but socially inferior, merchant class. <ref name=LC>{{citation
The '''subjective–objective dichotomy''', a longstanding [[Philosophy|philosophical]] topic, is concerned with the analysis of human experience, and of what within experience is "subjective" and what is "objective." The dichotomy arises from the premise that the world consists of ''objects'' (entities) which are [[perception|perceived]] or otherwise presumed to exist as entities, by ''subjects'' (observers). This division of experience results in questions regarding how subjects relate to objects. An important sub-topic is the question of how our own mind relates to other minds, and how to treat the "radical difference that holds between our access to our own experience and our access to the experience of all other human beings", known as the epistemological ''problem of other minds''.<ref name=Hyslop/>
| url = http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/ukiyo-e/intro.html
| title = The Floating World of Ukiyo-e: Shadows, Dreams, and Substance
| publisher = [[Library of Congress]]}}</ref>
[[Image:Courtesan painting a screen.jpg|left|300px|Courtesan painting a screen, Torii Kiyonobu I, ca. 1711]]
Literally, ''ukiyo-e'' means pictures of the Floating World, which included both [[geisha]] and respected [[courtesan]]s, two quite distinct classes.  It was a world of socially acceptable hedonism.


''[[Ukiyo-e|.... (read more)]]''
The subjective–objective dichotomy can be discussed from two standpoints. First is the question of "what" is known. The field of [[ontology]] deals with questions concerning what entities exist or can be said to exist, and how such entities can be grouped, related within a hierarchy, and subdivided according to similarities and differences. The second standpoint is that of "how" does one know what one knows. The field of [[epistemology]] questions what knowledge is, how it is acquired, and to what extent it is possible for a given entity to be known. It includes both subjects and objects.
 
''[[Subjective-objective dichotomy|.... (read more)]]''


{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="width: 90%; float: center; margin: 0.5em 1em 0.8em 0px;"
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="width: 90%; float: center; margin: 0.5em 1em 0.8em 0px;"
|-
|-
! style="text-align: center;" | &nbsp;[[Ukiyo-e#References|notes]]
! style="text-align: center;" | &nbsp;[[Subjective-objective dichotomy#References|notes]]
|-
|-
|
|
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}
|}
|}

Revision as of 21:52, 8 November 2013

Subjective-objective dichotomy


The subjective–objective dichotomy, a longstanding philosophical topic, is concerned with the analysis of human experience, and of what within experience is "subjective" and what is "objective." The dichotomy arises from the premise that the world consists of objects (entities) which are perceived or otherwise presumed to exist as entities, by subjects (observers). This division of experience results in questions regarding how subjects relate to objects. An important sub-topic is the question of how our own mind relates to other minds, and how to treat the "radical difference that holds between our access to our own experience and our access to the experience of all other human beings", known as the epistemological problem of other minds.[1]

The subjective–objective dichotomy can be discussed from two standpoints. First is the question of "what" is known. The field of ontology deals with questions concerning what entities exist or can be said to exist, and how such entities can be grouped, related within a hierarchy, and subdivided according to similarities and differences. The second standpoint is that of "how" does one know what one knows. The field of epistemology questions what knowledge is, how it is acquired, and to what extent it is possible for a given entity to be known. It includes both subjects and objects.

.... (read more)