CZ:Featured article/Current: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chunbum Park
(→‎Japanese English: Malthusianism)
imported>John Stephenson
(template)
 
(24 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== '''[[Malthusianism]]''' ==
{{:{{FeaturedArticleTitle}}}}
----
<small>
'''Malthusianism''' is a theory in [[demography]] regarding population growth. It holds that population expands faster than food supplies. Famine will result unless steps are taken to reduce population growth.
==Footnotes==
===Pre-Malthus notions===
Over the centuries many theorists have considered one or another aspect of population,<ref name=strane1904>Charles Emil Stangeland. (1904, 1955, 1966)  ''Pre-Malthusian Doctrines of Population: A Study in the History of Economic Theory''. Augustus M (1955). | A history of population theories. | [http://www.amazon.com/PRE-MALTHUSIAN-DOCTRINES-POPULATION-HISTwORY-ECONOMIC/dp/B00APO8AFI/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1375128619&sr=1-1 Amazon].</ref> usually to promote the policy of more people (“pronatalist.”) The early Christian tradition, however, was “antinatalist”, with the highest prestige going to priests, monks and nuns who were celibate.
 
In the 17th and 18th century the general belief, called "[[mercantilism]]" was that the larger the population the better for the nation.  Larger population meant more farmers and more food,  more people in church (and more prayers), and larger, more powerful armies for deterrence, defense and expansion. People equaled power. As [[Frederick the Great]] of Prussia put it, "The number of the people makes the wealth of states."  The policy implications were clear: the state should help raise population through annexation of territory and pronatalist subsidies that encourage large families.  After 1800, a rising spirit of nationalism called out for more people  to make a bigger and more powerful nation.
 
===Malthus===
English writer Reverend [[Thomas Malthus]] (1766-1834), in the first edition (1798) of his pamphlet, "An Essay on the Principle of Population" turned the received wisdom upside down.  His stunning conclusion was that more people might make it worse for everyone--that overpopulation was bad and unless proper steps were taken, disaster was inevitable.<ref name=mal1798>Malthus TR. (1798) [http://www.gutenberg.org/catalog/world/readfile?fk_files=3275431 An Essay on the Principle of Population by T. R. Malthus]. Produced by Charles Aldarondo.  HTML version by Al Haines. | Title links to full-text online.</ref>  Population growth was exceedingly dangerous, he warned, for it threatened overpopulation and soon we would all starve to death. The British were taking over India at this time, and could see first-hand the horrors associated with overpopulation.
 
 
''[[Malthusianism|.... (read more)]]''
 
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="width: 90%; float: center; margin: 0.5em 1em 0.8em 0px;"
|-
! style="text-align: center;" | &nbsp;[[Malthusianism#Notes|notes]]
|-
|
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}
|}
</small>

Latest revision as of 10:19, 11 September 2020

Inside of the round Carousel Theater, University of Tennessee, Knoxville. This fully-round theater, built in 1952, is well suited to intimate productions.

Theater in the round refers to theatrical performance space in which the audience sits on most or all sides of the stage (as opposed to the customary proscenium stage in which the performers face the audience, or the thrust stage where the audience sits on three sides).

Theaters in the round were common in ancient times, and although it never fell completely into disuse, the modern theater as it developed in Europe and America, generally favoured the proscenium theatre, which allows for grander productions. When the theater in the round format was revived in the mid-twentieth century, it was considered avant garde and progressive.

One advantage of theatres in the round is that they can dramatically reduce the need for lavish or complicated sets, in terms of curtains and scenery. A disadvantage is the extra staging considerations. Rather than the actors being able to focus to one direction, the director and set designer have to consider what the production will look like from different points of view, and how to eliminate or at least reduce the problem of characters having their backs to the audience.

The Stephen Joseph Theatre[1] in Scarborough, North Yorkshire was the UK's first theatre in the round.[2]

Alienation effect vs. Stanislovski technique

Theater in the round is a particularly appropriate setting for staging of dramas using Bertolt Brecht's alienation effect[3], which stands in opposition to the more traditional Stanislovski technique [4] in drama. Whereas the Constantin Stanislavski school of acting attempts to immerse the audience so deeply in belief of its characters that they can imagine themselves as the character, the Brechtian alienation effect deliverately tries to remind the audience that this is a fictional representation. Alienation techniques include tactics as obvious as displaying placards or posters around the set. With theater in the round, merely keeping the audience lit so that each audience member is constantly aware of the rest of the audience can act as an alienation technique.

Notes

  1. Wikipedia has more information about the Stephen Joseph Theatre.
  2. New Vic Theatre: 'Theatre-in-the-Round'. Accessed January 24, 2021.
  3. Alienation Effect in Encyclopedia Britannica online.
  4. The book "An Actor Prepares" was first published in 1936 and is the first volume of the translations of Constantin Stanislavski's books on acting, which were published as a trilogy in English, though originally meant to be published as two books in Russian.

Footnotes