CURB-65

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
This article is basically copied from an external source and has not been approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.
The content on this page originated on Wikipedia and is yet to be significantly improved. Contributors are invited to replace and add material to make this an original article.

CURB-65 is a validated score for predicting mortality in community-acquired pneumonia[1][2] and infection of any site[3]. The CURB-65 is based on the earlier CURB score[4] and is recommended by the British Thoracic Society for the assessment of severity of pneumonia.[5]

The score is an acronym for each of the risk factors measured. Each risk factor scores one point, for a maximum score of 5:

  • confusion (defined as an AMT of 8 or less)
  • urea greater than 7 mmol/l (19.6 mg/dl)
  • respiratory rate of 30 breaths per minute or greater
  • blood pressure less than 90 systolic or diastolic blood pressure 60 or less
  • age 65 or older

Removing the effect of age may improve accuracy.[6] A variation is the CURB-age.[7]

Predicting death from pneumonia

The risk of death increases as the score increases:

  • 0—0.7%
  • 1—3.2%
  • 2—13.0%
  • 3—17.0%
  • 4—41.5%
  • 5—57.0%

The CURB-65 has been compared to the pneumonia severity index in predicting mortality from pneumonia and may[8] or may not[9] be similar in accuracy.

Predicting death from any infection

A cohort study of patients with any type of infection (half of the patients had pneumonia), the risk of death increases as the score increases[3]:

  • 0 to 1 <5% mortality
  • 2 to 3 < 10% mortality
  • 4 to 5 15-30% mortality

References

  1. McNally M, Curtain J, O'Brien KK, Dimitrov BD, Fahey T (2010). "Validity of British Thoracic Society guidance (the CRB-65 rule) for predicting the severity of pneumonia in general practice: systematic review and meta-analysis.". Br J Gen Pract 60 (579): e423-33. DOI:10.3399/bjgp10X532422. PMID 20883616. PMC PMC2944951. Research Blogging.
  2. Lim WS, van der Eerden MM, Laing R, et al (2003). "Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study". Thorax 58 (5): 377-82. PMID 12728155[e]
  3. 3.0 3.1 Howell MD, Donnino MW, Talmor D, Clardy P, Ngo L, Shapiro NI (2007). "Performance of severity of illness scoring systems in emergency department patients with infection". Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 14 (8): 709-14. DOI:10.1197/j.aem.2007.02.036. PMID 17576773. Research Blogging.
  4. Lim WS, Macfarlane JT, Boswell TC, et al (2001). "Study of community acquired pneumonia aetiology (SCAPA) in adults admitted to hospital: implications for management guidelines". Thorax 56 (4): 296-301. PMID 11254821[e]
  5. (2001) "BTS Guidelines for the Management of Community Acquired Pneumonia in Adults". Thorax 56 Suppl 4: IV1-64. PMID 11713364[e]
  6. Chen JH, Chang SS, Liu JJ, Chan RC, Wu JY, Wang WC et al. (2010). "Comparison of clinical characteristics and performance of pneumonia severity score and CURB-65 among younger adults, elderly and very old subjects.". Thorax 65 (11): 971-7. DOI:10.1136/thx.2009.129627. PMID 20965934. Research Blogging.
  7. Myint PK, Sankaran P, Musonda P, Subramanian DN, Ruffell H, Smith AC et al. (2009). "Performance of CURB-65 and CURB-age in community-acquired pneumonia.". Int J Clin Pract 63 (9): 1345-50. DOI:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02147.x. PMID 19691619. Research Blogging.
  8. Ochoa-Gondar O, Vila-Corcoles A, Rodriguez-Blanco T, Ramos F, de Diego C, Salsench E et al. (2011). "Comparison of three predictive rules for assessing severity in elderly patients with CAP.". Int J Clin Pract 65 (11): 1165-72. DOI:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02742.x. PMID 21951687. Research Blogging.
  9. Aujesky D, Auble TE, Yealy DM, et al (2005). "Prospective comparison of three validated prediction rules for prognosis in community-acquired pneumonia". Am. J. Med. 118 (4): 384-92. DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.006. PMID 15808136. Research Blogging.

External links