< CZ:ProposalsRevision as of 12:19, 11 February 2008 by imported>Larry Sanger
Should history articles be named with general terms first?
Template:Proposal2
User feedback
Summary: Please edit your proposal record and provide a summary.
| Original proposer: Please specify original proposer (i.e., person who added the proposal to this page) |
Next step: Fill in next step
|
| Driver: Driver needed (i.e., someone familiar with the proposals system who will move it through the system) |
To be done by: Fill in target date for next step
|
|
To the proposer: please read the proposals system policy page if you want to fill out a complete proposal, not just this summary. If you don't, please ask around for someone (a "driver") to take over your proposal!
Start complete proposal
|
Warren Schudy 13:34, 9 February 2008 (CST)
| Response
|
| By: --Denis Cavanagh 14:27, 9 February 2008 (CST)
|
| I think its a good idea as long as its technically feasible.
|
| Response
|
| By: -- David E. Volk 08:24, 11 February 2008 (CST)
|
| This could be a source of malicious code. Saveguards would be needed to parse the text.
|
| Response
|
| By: --Paul Wormer 08:53, 11 February 2008 (CST)
|
| It would be best if outsider's comments came somehow to the notice of the main author(s) of the articles commented on. These authors could read the comments and decide whether or not to include them in the article. I don't foresee in the near future so many comments that this process must necessarily be automatized. If it becomes too much work, we can always start a new discussion on how to parse and edit automatically (including the difficult problem of automatic saveguards).
|