Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • It is used for its nuclear properties, including [[nuclear power generation]] and nuclear weapons, as well as the mechanical characteristics
    2 KB (355 words) - 17:02, 22 March 2024
  • {{r|nuclear power}}
    270 bytes (43 words) - 00:18, 8 May 2010
  • ...ar disaster]], leading him to initiate a long-term policy of phasing out [[nuclear power]] in [[Japan]]<ref>''Japan Times'': '[http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20
    1 KB (163 words) - 07:58, 26 December 2012
  • ...tion agreement on advancing the country’s civilian application of maritime nuclear power.
    5 KB (521 words) - 14:04, 27 February 2022
  • * Proliferation Implications of the Global Expansion of Civil Nuclear Power
    1 KB (178 words) - 08:46, 6 June 2024
  • ...ation Library] a well-organized authoritative collection of information on nuclear power. ...ar Power Has Been a Flop] Jack Devanney, 2020, a collection of articles on nuclear power, its history and why it has been unable to provide the safe, clean, abundan
    8 KB (1,033 words) - 12:21, 19 April 2024
  • Nuclear power is a controversial topic, and some of the controversies remain unsettled, e ...he physics cat is out of the bag. But the large majority of countries with nuclear power have no nuclear weapons. Some of them had weapons programs much earlier, bu
    7 KB (1,106 words) - 18:29, 5 May 2024
  • ...cific reactor design, to address the issues raised in the parent article [[Nuclear power reconsidered]].
    1 KB (194 words) - 18:15, 4 January 2022
  • ...on''' is one of the barriers to [[Nuclear_power_reconsidered|reconsidering nuclear power]]. Government agencies have for decades assumed that deaths and other bad ...ers and deaths. A more realistic assessment will show that the danger from nuclear power is much smaller than the public believes, and much smaller that the risks f
    6 KB (858 words) - 12:42, 20 May 2024
  • ''See also [[Nuclear power reconsidered]].''
    1 KB (214 words) - 16:23, 3 January 2023
  • Nuclear power is a controversial topic, and some of the controversies remain unsettled, e (2) No one has ever been harmed by nuclear waste from civilian nuclear power plants.<br>
    5 KB (802 words) - 05:41, 3 October 2023
  • ...power. This article will address the proliferation questions raised in [[Nuclear power reconsidered]]. It is frequently claimed that building a civil nuclear power program adds to the weapons proliferation risk. There is an overlap in the
    8 KB (1,232 words) - 07:26, 16 June 2024
  • ...y—carries into the surrounding environment 100 times more radiation than a nuclear power plant producing the same amount of energy." "ounce for ounce, coal ash rele It is important that we make a distinction between spent fuel from nuclear power, and the waste from bomb production, which was often done in a rush with li
    9 KB (1,317 words) - 15:12, 25 October 2023
  • {{r|nuclear power plant}}
    663 bytes (99 words) - 03:30, 24 February 2011
  • Over fifty obsolete and dangerous [[nuclear power plant]]s were operating on the lands of the former Soviet Union, including
    3 KB (373 words) - 03:51, 8 April 2009
  • {{r|Nuclear power reconsidered}}
    765 bytes (117 words) - 20:18, 28 May 2022
  • For power generation, nuclear reactors are the centerpiece of [[nuclear power plant]]s. Up to this time, nuclear reactors for large scale power generati
    10 KB (1,554 words) - 14:19, 24 January 2023
  • This article will address the issues raised in the parent article [[Nuclear power reconsidered]]. ...onvection and continue the flow of coolant through the core. Proponents of nuclear power call this "walk-away safe".
    3 KB (532 words) - 14:13, 12 November 2023
  • {{r|Nuclear power reconsidered}}
    846 bytes (132 words) - 14:57, 27 December 2022
  • ..." in [https://www.amazon.com/Why-Nuclear-Power-Been-Flop/dp/1098308964 Why Nuclear Power Has Been a Flop, Jack Devanney (2020)] Sigmoid No Threshold (SNT) is a bett
    2 KB (262 words) - 02:43, 31 December 2021
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)