Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- It is used for its nuclear properties, including [[nuclear power generation]] and nuclear weapons, as well as the mechanical characteristics2 KB (355 words) - 17:02, 22 March 2024
- {{r|nuclear power}}270 bytes (43 words) - 00:18, 8 May 2010
- ...ar disaster]], leading him to initiate a long-term policy of phasing out [[nuclear power]] in [[Japan]]<ref>''Japan Times'': '[http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn201 KB (163 words) - 07:58, 26 December 2012
- ...tion agreement on advancing the country’s civilian application of maritime nuclear power.5 KB (521 words) - 14:04, 27 February 2022
- * Proliferation Implications of the Global Expansion of Civil Nuclear Power1 KB (178 words) - 08:46, 6 June 2024
- ...ation Library] a well-organized authoritative collection of information on nuclear power. ...ar Power Has Been a Flop] Jack Devanney, 2020, a collection of articles on nuclear power, its history and why it has been unable to provide the safe, clean, abundan8 KB (1,033 words) - 12:21, 19 April 2024
- Nuclear power is a controversial topic, and some of the controversies remain unsettled, e ...he physics cat is out of the bag. But the large majority of countries with nuclear power have no nuclear weapons. Some of them had weapons programs much earlier, bu7 KB (1,106 words) - 18:29, 5 May 2024
- ...cific reactor design, to address the issues raised in the parent article [[Nuclear power reconsidered]].1 KB (194 words) - 18:15, 4 January 2022
- ...on''' is one of the barriers to [[Nuclear_power_reconsidered|reconsidering nuclear power]]. Government agencies have for decades assumed that deaths and other bad ...ers and deaths. A more realistic assessment will show that the danger from nuclear power is much smaller than the public believes, and much smaller that the risks f6 KB (858 words) - 12:42, 20 May 2024
- ''See also [[Nuclear power reconsidered]].''1 KB (214 words) - 16:23, 3 January 2023
- Nuclear power is a controversial topic, and some of the controversies remain unsettled, e (2) No one has ever been harmed by nuclear waste from civilian nuclear power plants.<br>5 KB (802 words) - 05:41, 3 October 2023
- ...power. This article will address the proliferation questions raised in [[Nuclear power reconsidered]]. It is frequently claimed that building a civil nuclear power program adds to the weapons proliferation risk. There is an overlap in the8 KB (1,232 words) - 07:26, 16 June 2024
- ...y—carries into the surrounding environment 100 times more radiation than a nuclear power plant producing the same amount of energy." "ounce for ounce, coal ash rele It is important that we make a distinction between spent fuel from nuclear power, and the waste from bomb production, which was often done in a rush with li9 KB (1,317 words) - 15:12, 25 October 2023
- {{r|nuclear power plant}}663 bytes (99 words) - 03:30, 24 February 2011
- Over fifty obsolete and dangerous [[nuclear power plant]]s were operating on the lands of the former Soviet Union, including3 KB (373 words) - 03:51, 8 April 2009
- {{r|Nuclear power reconsidered}}765 bytes (117 words) - 20:18, 28 May 2022
- For power generation, nuclear reactors are the centerpiece of [[nuclear power plant]]s. Up to this time, nuclear reactors for large scale power generati10 KB (1,554 words) - 14:19, 24 January 2023
- This article will address the issues raised in the parent article [[Nuclear power reconsidered]]. ...onvection and continue the flow of coolant through the core. Proponents of nuclear power call this "walk-away safe".3 KB (532 words) - 14:13, 12 November 2023
- {{r|Nuclear power reconsidered}}846 bytes (132 words) - 14:57, 27 December 2022
- ..." in [https://www.amazon.com/Why-Nuclear-Power-Been-Flop/dp/1098308964 Why Nuclear Power Has Been a Flop, Jack Devanney (2020)] Sigmoid No Threshold (SNT) is a bett2 KB (262 words) - 02:43, 31 December 2021