Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Results 1 – 11 of 11
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • #REDIRECT [[Filartiga v. Pena-Irala]]
    37 bytes (4 words) - 22:58, 6 March 2009
  • .../ref> The opinion, in part, was based on the precedent set in the 1984 [[Filartiga v. Pena-Irala]] ruling by the [[U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit]].<ref name= |litigants=Filartiga v. Pena-Irala
    1 KB (176 words) - 12:24, 4 March 2009
  • In the 1984 appeal of '''Filartiga v. Pena-Irala''', the [[U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit]] held "hold that de |litigants=Filartiga v. Pena-Irala
    2 KB (257 words) - 11:32, 29 March 2009
  • {{r|Filartiga v. Pena-Irala}}
    452 bytes (59 words) - 01:11, 21 March 2024
  • {{r|Filartiga v. Pena-Irala||**}}
    593 bytes (73 words) - 12:51, 29 May 2024
  • {{r|Filartiga v. Pena-Irala}}
    2 KB (213 words) - 12:51, 29 May 2024
  • ...United States."<ref>28 USC 1350</ref> It became prominent with the 1984 [[Filartiga v. Pena-Irala]] case, in which the [[U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit]] found
    2 KB (280 words) - 12:51, 29 May 2024
  • ...ho are variously either resident in the country taking the action (e.g., [[Filartiga v. Pena-Irala]]) or by citizens of the national actor.
    4 KB (621 words) - 14:39, 7 June 2024