Archive:Notice Board
This page is for notices and reminders--memo-type stuff--to everyone working on this wiki. It's for administrative notices concerning day-to-day operations, important policy clarifications, requests, technical announcements, etc.
- For news, use the Citizendium Blog.
- Have questions? Ask here.
- For discussion, use the Citizendium Forums.
- For community-wide announcements, use Citizendium-L.
- For announcements just to editors, use Citizendium-Editors.
For previous notices, see CZ:Notice Board/Archive.
May 2,2007
For news on articles that are nearing approval and nominated for approval:[1]
- Favicon.ico has been changed. (Provided by Larry Sanger).
- Forums dedicated to workgroups have reciprocal links to workgroup pages on the wiki. Adding this required a change to the default theme of the forum software.
Jason Potkanski 23:49, 2 May 2007 (CDT)
April 27, 2007
Recently, a notice board dedicated to articles that are negotiating the approvals process has been created. Please see [CZ:Approval Announcements]. Also, the Aikido article has been restored; for why, see CZ Talk:Approval Announcements#Follow-up on Aikido.
Reid (one of our webservers) has had software upgrades and has been added back to the rotation of servers. Any quirks or strange happenings please report to bugs @ cz email address. Also, our hosting provider is doing network upgrades which may make the site unavailable around 2AM CDT.Jason Potkanski 17:21, 27 April 2007 (CDT)
April 25,2007
From 3:05 to about 3:20 CST it appears our hosting provider had routing trouble which resulted in CZ being unavailable. Also, in the same breath, Router Maintenance will occur this Friday at around 2AM CST for an planned outage of 15 to 20 minutes. https://support.steadfast.net/index.php?_m=news&_a=viewnews&newsid=137&group=default Jason Potkanski 15:32, 25 April 2007 (CDT)
April 24,2007
It's Tuesday Night- see CZ:Approval_Announcements. We have our first Health Sciences Approved article, and 3 newly nominated articles for approval (in 2 Disciplines that have no approved articles as yet). All these articles need your eyes and comments, please! Nancy Sculerati 20:51, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
April 23, 2007
I've registered eduzendium.org--try it out. --Larry Sanger 23:34, 22 April 2007 (CDT)
We've also set up the "TI" (Topic Informant) namespace. See Topic Informant Workgroup.
I have accidentally nuked recentchanges using maintenance script rebuildrecentchanges.php. The result was unexpected and related to squishing a request for watchlist histories to bechave like Wikipedia's (30 days as opposed to default 7), working to correct. Jason Potkanski 07:45, 23 April 2007 (CDT)
Update: Recent Changes has been repaired. The good: recent changes now goes back 30 days, and watchlist data does as well. Statistic: A count of the recentchanges database table showed 27,000 edits in the last 30 days. The bad: Log entries such as new user creation, delete, etc that appeared in recent changes are missing but are still available by accessing the special:log pages directly. Jason Potkanski 09:01, 23 April 2007 (CDT)
April 21, 2007
What, the Computers Workgroup has an approved article? Yes, indeed, the first of many is now here in all its (his?) glory, da da DA DA....Tux. Congratulations!
April 20, 2007
Infant colic
Infant colic is shortly to be nominated (by me) for approval. Authored by User:Christo Muller, a physician experienced in the care of inconsolable infants, it is important that the article itself is not changed by edits, please, at this stage. HOWEVER, it needs eyes for copyediting and comments. As it is a sensitive subject that directly bears on the care of infants, I ask that these comments be put on the talk page. They will be addressed. Nancy Sculerati 07:17, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
Editorial Council now in its infancy
The Editorial Council has just been kicked off. See CZ Editorial Council Members for a list of members; its wiki home will be at Editorial Council; the section of the Policy Outline that gives its (current!) governing rules is right here; and its mailing list archives are available (little there right now).
April 14, 2007
Pictures wanted - for series on normal infant and child development. For parents who are willing to let CZ publish their own pictures of their own children, we would appreciate pictures of babies smiling, holding things, and youngsters crawling, standing, and walking. Especially those -"first standing holding on" type shots. Crying infants for Infant colic who are between about 1 and 3 months of age also wanted. These pictures can only be used if uploaded with permission for CZ to use and a statement that says the pictures were taken by you (you have copyright). Thanks (and for those whose babies are the furry and four-legged (or feathered) we need pets, too! Nancy Sculerati 16:35, 14 April 2007 (CDT)
April 13, 2007
Servers are behaving badly. Looking into it.
UPDATE: Database server had a disk full problem. Fixes are in place. No data was lost. The database is doing an unscheduled vacuum at the moment as a sanity check. Site will be slow and sometimes unresponsive while the vacuum is running.
UPDATE: One web server was just behaving badly. Locke was taken out of rotation and had it's operating system upgraded inplace from CentOS 4.4 to CentOS 5.0. Locke will rejoin the rotation shortly after testing. Jason Potkanski 22:49, 13 April 2007 (CDT)
April 4, 2007
Thanks to many people hard at work on The Big Cleanup, the pages in our database that have been checklisted now number 721. That represents a lot of useful work; we're over a quarter finished, since the total number of pages to go through is about 2800, and not all of them are articles, so not all of them will be checklisted. This also means that we can get a rough idea of the breakdown of our articles. (The count is skewed to a certain extent by the fact that some people went through Jaap Winius' copious snake articles, which upped the count of "external" articles.) Anyway, 331 of the articles, or 46%, are nonstub articles, meaning they are over 100 words or so, and are not merely copied here from elsewhere. Only 232, or 32%, are marked as external articles, meaning articles that began life elsewhere (typically, Wikipedia) and have not been significantly changed since they were uploaded. We have been deleting these pretty aggressively.
- Anti Vandal changed not synced to reid properly, done so.
- Error searching for images and returning a database error was fixed by Greg.
- Textop.org wiki locked from spam.
- Creation of new testbeds on dev server for development use. Electrawn 01:21, 5 April 2007 (CDT)
April 3, 2007
- Anti Vandal extension modified to send a no-cache, must-revalidate header. Users blocked by the extension were ending up in squid's cache, causing genuine users to occasionally get blocked messages. Electrawn 03:39, 3 April 2007 (CDT)
April 2, 2007
Vandalism update
We just had our first vandal attack outside of our self-registration period. All the damage has been undone. The user account was made during our self-registration period--a "sleeper account." There's a chance there's a few more of these, so this evening, constables will be checking through our account list for bogus accounts. We'll also be deleting older, never-used accounts soon. It remains the case that vandalism has been exclusively the result of self-registration.
Technical update
- PHP Sessions are now shared between servers via NFS. Not the best solution, but problems with suddenly being logged out should clear.
- A Math/TeX rendering bug has been fixed and submitted to MediaWiki developers as a patch. As a side effect, servers are much more stable.
- A change was made to our anti vandal extension to enable it to work with our Squid proxy configuration. 403 errors claiming to be a "Major search engine bot" should disappear. Electrawn 01:18, 2 April 2007 (CDT)
April 1, 2007
We now have more articles than Wikipedia!
(April Fool!)
Well, if we keep creating very short articles, called "stubs," we will. Please, while it's all right to create a few stubs, particularly if you're committed to expanding them sometime soon, we would prefer that you focus on a smaller number of longer articles. It really does not do anyone good to have many very short articles. Stubs contain almost no information, and therefore not the information for which people might want to search; they "scratch the itch" of red links, when we would like that itch more fully scratched with a good article; they are a poor example to newer people, who follow the example by writing short articles of their own; and they are, arguably, a sign of vanity, because they merely add to the number of articles you've started!
Congratulations to Petréa_Mitchell, who put the right workgroup category on the United States of America. Thank you.