Human rights/Addendum: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
imported>Nick Gardner
Line 50: Line 50:


===[http://www.cidh.oas.org/basicos/english/basic3.american%20convention.htm  The American Convention on Human Rights 1969]===
===[http://www.cidh.oas.org/basicos/english/basic3.american%20convention.htm  The American Convention on Human Rights 1969]===
The Convention is similar in content to the European Convention, except that it can be interpreted as forbidding abortion.  It has been ratified by only 24  out of the 35 countries of the American Continent (excluding the United States and Canada).


===The [http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/z1afchar.htm African Charter on Human Rights 1981]===
===The [http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/z1afchar.htm African Charter on Human Rights 1981]===

Revision as of 15:14, 21 August 2012

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Tutorials [?]
Addendum [?]
 
This addendum is a continuation of the article Human rights.

Human Rights Declarations

The United States Declaration of Independence (1776)

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."

The French Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen [1] (1789

"Men are born free and remain free and equal in rights. Social distinctions can be based only on public utility. The aim of every political association is the preservation of the natural and imprescriptible rights of man. These rights are liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression."

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)

The first two articles of the Declaration[1] are declarations of its universality. They are followed by seventeen articles that specify rights that are now generally accepted by western democracies, and two that deal with implementation by the requirement that "Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law." (article 8) and "Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him"(article 10). Of the remaining articles, five (22 to 26) are additional "social articles" that specify rights to social security, employment and trade union membership, leisure, health and education.

The Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam (1990)

The Cairo declaration [2] was signed by the member states of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference in 1990. Article 24 of the declaration states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia" and article 25,states that "The Islamic Sharia is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration".

The Bangkok Declaration (1993)

The Bangkok declaration recognises that "while human rights are universal in nature, they must be considered in the context of a dynamic and evolving process of international norm-setting, bearing in mind the significance of national and regional particularities and various historical, cultural and religious backgrounds" [3].

The Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action(1993)

[4].

Human Rights Instruments

Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

The 1948 Genocide Convention [5]

The United Nations Core Treaties on Human Rights

(the numbers of ratifications by May 2012 are shown thus [xxx])

Countries become bound to a particular treaty through ratification or accession to it. Either of these two acts signals a country’s concrete willingness to undertake the legal rights and obligations contained in a treaty. A country that has ratified or acceded to a treaty is often referred to as being ‘party to’ the treaty. Signature of a treaty by a country is an indication that the country intends to examine the treaty to determine its position towards it before ratification. While a signature does not bind a country to a treaty, it does result in an obligation to refrain from acts which might defeat the object and purpose of the treaty. Reservations, understandings, and declarations (RUDs) allow a country to exempt itself from certain obligations with which state parties are normally expected to comply.

Status by instrument
Ratification by country


The European Convention on Human Rights 1950

The Convention is legally binding on the 47 out of the 51 European countries who are members of the Council of Europe. It includes qualified rights to life, liberty and security, freedom of thought, conscience and religion, expression, assembly and association; and an unqualified prohibition of torture. The rights content is thus similar to that of the Universal Declaration, but withoui the social articles. Unlike the Universal Declaration, it guarantees remedies against abuse and creates a Court of Human Rights for that purpose.

The American Convention on Human Rights 1969

The Convention is similar in content to the European Convention, except that it can be interpreted as forbidding abortion. It has been ratified by only 24 out of the 35 countries of the American Continent (excluding the United States and Canada).

The African Charter on Human Rights 1981

Human rights jurisprudence

Legislation

Implementation

The Inter-American Court on Human Rights

The European Court of Human Rights

The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights

Cases

References