Pluricentric language: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Domergue Sumien
No edit summary
imported>Domergue Sumien
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
A '''pluricentric language''' is a language with different [[standard language|standard]] varieties, originating from different states (sometimes from different regions, dialects or communities), without precluding the unity of the language.  
A '''pluricentric language''', sometimes called a ''polycentric language'',<ref>Several authors prefer to say ''polycentric languages'' for esthetic reasons, since ''poly-'' and ''centr-'' come both from Greek, whereas ''pluri-'' comes from Latin.</ref> is a language with different [[standard language|standard]] varieties, originating from different states (sometimes from different regions, dialects or communities), without precluding the unity of the language.  


Typical and well-studied examples are:
Typical and well-studied examples are:
Line 9: Line 9:
* [[Catalan language|Catalan]], including differing regional standards such as [[Central Catalan]], [[Valencian Catalan]], [[Balearic Catalan]] and [[Rossellonès Catalan]].
* [[Catalan language|Catalan]], including differing regional standards such as [[Central Catalan]], [[Valencian Catalan]], [[Balearic Catalan]] and [[Rossellonès Catalan]].


This concept was developped mainly by two proeminent [[sociolinguistics|sociolinguists]]. The German [[Heinz Kloss]] coined the term ''pluricentric high languages (plurizentrische Hochsprachen)'', especially from 1978 on.<ref>KLOSS Heinz (1978) ''Die Entwicklung neuer germanischer Kultursprachen seit 1800'', coll. Sprache der Gegenwart-Schriften des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache nº 37, Düsseldorf: Schwann [1st ed. 1952, Munich: Pohl]</ref> Later, the Australian [[Michael Clyne]] promoted the term ''pluricentric languages'' in 1992<ref>CLYNE Michael (1992) (dir.) ''Pluricentric languages: differing norms in different nations'', coll. Contributions to the sociology of language nº 62, Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter</ref> (it has to be noted that several authors prefer to say ''polycentric languages'' for esthetic reasons, since ''poly-'' and ''centr-'' come both from Greek, whereas ''pluri-'' comes from Latin).
This concept was developped mainly by two proeminent [[sociolinguistics|sociolinguists]]. The German [[Heinz Kloss]] coined the term ''pluricentric high languages (plurizentrische Hochsprachen)'', especially from 1978 on.<ref>KLOSS Heinz (1978) ''Die Entwicklung neuer germanischer Kultursprachen seit 1800'', coll. Sprache der Gegenwart-Schriften des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache nº 37, Düsseldorf: Schwann [1st ed. 1952, Munich: Pohl]</ref> Later, the Australian [[Michael Clyne]] promoted the term ''pluricentric languages'' in 1992<ref>CLYNE Michael (1992) (dir.) ''Pluricentric languages: differing norms in different nations'', coll. Contributions to the sociology of language nº 62, Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter</ref>.


==Notes==
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 07:16, 3 August 2011

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

A pluricentric language, sometimes called a polycentric language,[1] is a language with different standard varieties, originating from different states (sometimes from different regions, dialects or communities), without precluding the unity of the language.

Typical and well-studied examples are:

This concept was developped mainly by two proeminent sociolinguists. The German Heinz Kloss coined the term pluricentric high languages (plurizentrische Hochsprachen), especially from 1978 on.[2] Later, the Australian Michael Clyne promoted the term pluricentric languages in 1992[3].

Notes

  1. Several authors prefer to say polycentric languages for esthetic reasons, since poly- and centr- come both from Greek, whereas pluri- comes from Latin.
  2. KLOSS Heinz (1978) Die Entwicklung neuer germanischer Kultursprachen seit 1800, coll. Sprache der Gegenwart-Schriften des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache nº 37, Düsseldorf: Schwann [1st ed. 1952, Munich: Pohl]
  3. CLYNE Michael (1992) (dir.) Pluricentric languages: differing norms in different nations, coll. Contributions to the sociology of language nº 62, Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter