Arab Spring: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
No edit summary
imported>Nick Gardner
No edit summary
Line 39: Line 39:
}}   
}}   
</ref>
</ref>
==References==
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 03:25, 26 August 2011

International reactions

The main initiative behind the military intervention in Libya came from the governments of the United States, France and Britain. A crucial factor, however, was an Arab League recommendation to the United Nations for a no-fly zone. The resolutions subsequently passed by the Security Council have been described as "the most wide-ranging that it had passed for more than 20 years [1]. The European Council later declared its commitment to "the full implementation" of Security Council Resolutions 1970 and 1973[2], but there was also opposition to military intervention, even from within the European Union. There was opposition by Germany [3] and reluctant participation by Italy. Among other reactions was the condemnation of the UN resolution on Libya as comparable to "medieval calls for crusades" Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin (repudiated, however, by President Dmitry Medvedev[4]


While there is no evidence of non-Arab influences upon the Arab Spring uprisings, and every indication that they came as a sudden surprise to all who were not directly involved, some human rights workers have suggested that the leaks of candid diplomatic cables by the whistleblower organization WikiLeaks served as a trigger for the uprising.[5][6][7]

References