Talk:Wisconsin v. Yoder: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>James F. Perry
(talk page)
 
imported>James F. Perry
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== Re-write of summation of the legal case ==
After having set aside this work for several weeks and then come back to it, I discovered that my original work no longer seemed so brilliant to me. The re-write which I have begun this day is designed to more closely hew to the actual development of the Court's case as expressed in the majority opinion of the Court, written by then Chief Justice Warren Burger. Of course, it cannot be, nor is it meant to be, a substitute for reading the entire opinion.
I will also be re-writing the section on the legacy of this important case (also originally written by myself), a section which, in its current form, I hold to be far from satisfactory.
[[User:James F. Perry|James F. Perry]] 19:10, 9 August 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 18:10, 9 August 2008

This article is developed but not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision in which it was held that the constitutional rights of the Amish, under the "free exercise of religion" clause, were violated by the state's compulsory school attendance law. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Religion, Law and Education [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

Re-write of summation of the legal case

After having set aside this work for several weeks and then come back to it, I discovered that my original work no longer seemed so brilliant to me. The re-write which I have begun this day is designed to more closely hew to the actual development of the Court's case as expressed in the majority opinion of the Court, written by then Chief Justice Warren Burger. Of course, it cannot be, nor is it meant to be, a substitute for reading the entire opinion.

I will also be re-writing the section on the legacy of this important case (also originally written by myself), a section which, in its current form, I hold to be far from satisfactory.

James F. Perry 19:10, 9 August 2008 (CDT)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Wisconsin_v._Yoder&oldid=492303"