Holon: Difference between revisions
imported>Michael J. Formica No edit summary |
imported>Michael J. Formica |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
===Social holon=== | ===Social holon=== | ||
A social holon | A social holon possesses nexus agency, but is not a monad. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
Revision as of 18:43, 21 January 2008
Holon is a term first coined by Arthur Koestler in his book The Ghost in the Machine to describe a phenomenon that is simultaneously a whole in itself, as well as a part of a larger system. The word itself is constructed from the Greek holos, which means whole, in combination with the suffix -on, which means part. [1]
Koestler was compelled by two observations in proposing the notion of the holon. The first observation was influenced by Noble Prize winner Herbert Simon's parable of the two watchmakers, wherein Simon concludes that complex systems will evolve from simple systems much more rapidly if there are stable intermediate forms present in that evolutionary process than if they are not present. [2] The second observation was made by Koestler himself in his analysis of hierarchies and stable intermediate forms in both living organisms and social organizations. He concluded that, although it is easy to identify sub-wholes or parts, wholes and parts in an absolute sense do not exist anywhere. Koestler proposed the word holon to describe the hybrid nature of sub-wholes and parts within in vivo systems. From this perspective, holons exist simultaneously as self-contained wholes in relation to their sub-ordinate parts, and dependent parts when considered from the inverse direction.
Koestler also points out that holons are autonomous, self-reliant units that possess a degree of independence and handle contingencies without asking higher authorities for instructions. These holons are also simultaneously subject to control from one or more of these higher authorities. The first property ensures that holons are stable forms that are able to withstand disturbances, while the latter property signifies that they are intermediate forms, providing a context for the proper functionality for the larger whole.
Finally, Koestler defines a holarchy as a hierarchy of self-regulating holons that function first as autonomous wholes in supra-ordination to their parts, secondly as dependent parts in sub- ordination to controls on higher levels, and thirdly in coordination with their local environment.
Types of holons
Individual holon
An individual holon is a discrete and independent monad.
Social holon
A social holon possesses nexus agency, but is not a monad.