Category of functors: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Aleksander Stos (subp) |
imported>Jitse Niesen (move references to subpage, clean up) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
#A morphism of functors <math>F,G</math> is a '''natural transformation''' <math>\eta:F\to G</math>; i.e., for each object <math>U</math> of <math>C</math>, a morphism in <math>D</math> <math>\eta_U:F(U)\to G(U)</math> such that for all morphisms <math>f:U\to V</math> in <math>C^{op}</math>, the diagram (DIAGRAM) commutes. | #A morphism of functors <math>F,G</math> is a '''natural transformation''' <math>\eta:F\to G</math>; i.e., for each object <math>U</math> of <math>C</math>, a morphism in <math>D</math> <math>\eta_U:F(U)\to G(U)</math> such that for all morphisms <math>f:U\to V</math> in <math>C^{op}</math>, the diagram (DIAGRAM) commutes. | ||
A ''natural isomorphism'' is a natural | A ''natural isomorphism'' is a natural transformation <math>\eta</math> such that <math>\eta_U</math> is an isomorphism in <math>D</math> for every object <math>U</math>. One can verify that natural isomorphisms are indeed isomorphisms in the category of functors. | ||
An important class of functors are the ''representable'' functors; i.e., functors that are naturally isomorphic to a functor of the form <math>h_X=Mor_C(-,X)</math>. | An important class of functors are the ''representable'' functors; i.e., functors that are naturally isomorphic to a functor of the form <math>h_X=Mor_C(-,X)</math>. | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
# If <math>F</math> is any contravariant functor <math>F:C^{op}\to Sets</math>, then the natural transformations of <math>Mor_C(-,X)</math> to <math>F</math> are in correspondence with the elements of the set <math>F(X)</math>. | # If <math>F</math> is any contravariant functor <math>F:C^{op}\to Sets</math>, then the natural transformations of <math>Mor_C(-,X)</math> to <math>F</math> are in correspondence with the elements of the set <math>F(X)</math>. | ||
# If the functors <math>Mor_C(-,X)</math> and <math>Mor_C(-,X')</math> are isomorphic, then <math>X</math> and <math>X'</math> are isomorphic in <math>C</math>. More generally, the functor <math>h:C\to Funct(C^{op},Sets)</math>, <math>X\mapsto h_X</math>, is an equivalence of categories between <math>C</math> and the full subcategory of ''representable'' functors in <math>Funct(C^{op},Sets)</math>. | # If the functors <math>Mor_C(-,X)</math> and <math>Mor_C(-,X')</math> are isomorphic, then <math>X</math> and <math>X'</math> are isomorphic in <math>C</math>. More generally, the functor <math>h:C\to Funct(C^{op},Sets)</math>, <math>X\mapsto h_X</math>, is an equivalence of categories between <math>C</math> and the full subcategory of ''representable'' functors in <math>Funct(C^{op},Sets)</math>. | ||
Revision as of 06:32, 27 July 2008
This article focuses on the category of contravariant functors between two categories.
The category of functors
Let and be two categories. The category of functors has
- Objects are functors
- A morphism of functors is a natural transformation ; i.e., for each object of , a morphism in such that for all morphisms in , the diagram (DIAGRAM) commutes.
A natural isomorphism is a natural transformation such that is an isomorphism in for every object . One can verify that natural isomorphisms are indeed isomorphisms in the category of functors.
An important class of functors are the representable functors; i.e., functors that are naturally isomorphic to a functor of the form .
Examples
- In the theory of schemes, the presheaves are often referred to as the functor of points of the scheme X. Yoneda's lemma allows one to think of a scheme as a functor in some sense, which becomes a powerful interpretation; indeed, meaningful geometric concepts manifest themselves naturally in this language, including (for example) functorial characterizations of smooth morphisms of schemes.
The Yoneda lemma
Let be a category and let be objects of . Then
- If is any contravariant functor , then the natural transformations of to are in correspondence with the elements of the set .
- If the functors and are isomorphic, then and are isomorphic in . More generally, the functor , , is an equivalence of categories between and the full subcategory of representable functors in .