Larry Sanger: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anthony Argyriou
(rewrite for style a little)
imported>Robert W King
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Lsanger02sm.jpg|right|thumb|Larry Sanger]]
[[Image:Lsanger02sm.jpg|right|thumb|Larry Sanger]]


'''Lawrence Mark ("Larry") Sanger''' (born 16 July 1968 in Bellevue, Washington) has been prominently associated with the intital projects of several online encyclopedias, the most notable being [[Wikipedia]] and [[Citizendium]]Born in Washington but raised in Alaska, Sanger received a PH.D. in philosophy from Ohio State University in 2000.
'''Lawrence Mark ("Larry") Sanger''' was born July 16, 1968 in Bellevue, Washington.  Raised in Alaska, Sanger received a Ph.D. in philosophy from Ohio State University in 2000.  He was the editor-in-chief of Nupedia, co-founder and chief organizer of Wikipedia, and is the founder and current editor-in-chief of Citizendium.


Sanger's first online encyclopedia project was [[Nupedia]], which lasted from March of 2000 to September 2003.  Sanger was its salaried editor-in-chief until it ran out of funding in 2001 and Sanger resigned.  Nupedia was a Web-based effort that was supposed to be written and edited by experts in each field and although it was a [[free content]] encyclopedia it was not a [[wiki]] to which anyone with access to the Internet could contribute editorial content.  Although the project failed, it was a forerunner of Wikipedia, which was begun as an offshoot of Nupedia.
Sanger's first online encyclopedia project was web-based [[Nupedia]], which lasted from March of 2000 to September 2003.  Sanger was its salaried editor-in-chief until March 1, 2002, but was a volunteer editor a month prior to his resignationEffectively unfunded until that time, Nupedia was written by both subject matter experts and the public-at-large although it was edited and reviewed solely by those experts.  Despite being a a [[free content]] encyclopedia, it was not a [[wiki]] to which anyone with access to the Internet could contribute editorial content.  Although the project failed, it was a forerunner of Wikipedia, which was begun as an offshoot of Nupedia.


Co-founded by [[Jimmy Wales]] and Sanger, Wikipedia was a wiki-based project in which content could be contributed and edited anyone at all.  This time Sanger was characterized being as its salaried "chief organizer," although he had no official title.  Sanger stated later that "I stopped participating in Wikipedia when funding for my position ran out."<ref>[http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2004/12/30/142458/25 Sanger's Kuro5hin essay]</ref>
Co-founded by [[Jimmy Wales]] and Sanger, Wikipedia was a wiki-based project in which content could be contributed and edited anyone at all.  This time Sanger was characterized being as its salaried "chief organizer," although he had no official title.   


In a well-known and controversial 31 December 2004 online essay at Kuro5hin<ref>all direct quotes cited here are from the same essay referenced above</ref> Sanger explained "Why Wikipedia Must Jettison Its Anti-Elitism" and detailed why "Wikipedia does have 2 big problems."  The problems he was referring to were
On December 31, 2004, a well-known and controversial online essay was published at Kuro5hin<ref>all direct quotes cited here are from the same essay referenced above</ref> in which Sanger detailed "Why Wikipedia Must Jettison Its Anti-Elitism", and that "Wikipedia does have two big problems."  The problems he was referring to were the lack of public perception of credibility, particularly in areas of detail, and the dominance of difficult people, trolls, and their enablers. He identified "anti-elitism, or lack of respect for expertise" as the roots of these problems.
*"lack of public perception of credibility, particularly in areas of detail."
*"the dominance of difficult people, trolls, and their enablers."
As the root of these difficulties he identified "anti-elitism, or lack of respect for expertise."


Hoping to build upon his experience with the earlier encyclopedias and to avoid their pitfalls, Sanger launched Citizendium on 15 September 2006.  Originally conceived to be an improved [[fork]] of Wikipedia, it quickly evolved to its present formIts three main differences from Wikipedia are:
Hoping to build upon his experience with the earlier encyclopedias and to avoid their pitfalls, Sanger launched Citizendium on 15 September 2006.  Originally conceived to be an improved [[fork]] of Wikipedia, a consensus was reached to develop an individual sense of identityThis was accomplished by cleaning up or removing articles originally forked in an effort called "The Big Delete." 


*that all contributors must apply for membership in the project under their real names, which are then visibly associated with all articles.
The three main differences between Citizendium and Wikipedia are:
*that all articles are reviewed by experts in that particular field who offer suggestions and criticism as the articles evolve, with the goal for each article to be "approved", meaning that it becomes mostly off-limits to further editing.
 
*all contributors must apply for membership in the project under their real names, which are then visibly associated with all articles
*all articles are reviewed by experts in their particular fields, offering suggestions and criticism as the articles evolve with the goal for each article to be "approved"  
*that vandals, trolls, and disruptive editors are quickly and permanently banned from further work on the project.
*that vandals, trolls, and disruptive editors are quickly and permanently banned from further work on the project.
As of May, 2007, Sanger himself is an active contributor to several on-going articles in Citizendium.


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 12:46, 29 May 2007

Larry Sanger

Lawrence Mark ("Larry") Sanger was born July 16, 1968 in Bellevue, Washington. Raised in Alaska, Sanger received a Ph.D. in philosophy from Ohio State University in 2000. He was the editor-in-chief of Nupedia, co-founder and chief organizer of Wikipedia, and is the founder and current editor-in-chief of Citizendium.

Sanger's first online encyclopedia project was web-based Nupedia, which lasted from March of 2000 to September 2003. Sanger was its salaried editor-in-chief until March 1, 2002, but was a volunteer editor a month prior to his resignation. Effectively unfunded until that time, Nupedia was written by both subject matter experts and the public-at-large although it was edited and reviewed solely by those experts. Despite being a a free content encyclopedia, it was not a wiki to which anyone with access to the Internet could contribute editorial content. Although the project failed, it was a forerunner of Wikipedia, which was begun as an offshoot of Nupedia.

Co-founded by Jimmy Wales and Sanger, Wikipedia was a wiki-based project in which content could be contributed and edited anyone at all. This time Sanger was characterized being as its salaried "chief organizer," although he had no official title.

On December 31, 2004, a well-known and controversial online essay was published at Kuro5hin[1] in which Sanger detailed "Why Wikipedia Must Jettison Its Anti-Elitism", and that "Wikipedia does have two big problems." The problems he was referring to were the lack of public perception of credibility, particularly in areas of detail, and the dominance of difficult people, trolls, and their enablers. He identified "anti-elitism, or lack of respect for expertise" as the roots of these problems.

Hoping to build upon his experience with the earlier encyclopedias and to avoid their pitfalls, Sanger launched Citizendium on 15 September 2006. Originally conceived to be an improved fork of Wikipedia, a consensus was reached to develop an individual sense of identity. This was accomplished by cleaning up or removing articles originally forked in an effort called "The Big Delete."

The three main differences between Citizendium and Wikipedia are:

  • all contributors must apply for membership in the project under their real names, which are then visibly associated with all articles
  • all articles are reviewed by experts in their particular fields, offering suggestions and criticism as the articles evolve with the goal for each article to be "approved"
  • that vandals, trolls, and disruptive editors are quickly and permanently banned from further work on the project.

References

  1. all direct quotes cited here are from the same essay referenced above