CZ:Managing Editor/2010/002 - References to war criminals: Difference between revisions
< CZ:Managing Editor | 2010
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (initial structuring) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Statement of problem == | |||
The basic question: is it acceptable and objective to use, in general article text, the term "war criminal" to someone for which a great deal of incriminating data was listed, but was never tried and convicted by a court, such as [[Adolf Hitler]] or [[Josef Mengele]]? If that is unacceptable, should the words "war criminal" be deleted from a direct quote stating an expert opinion? | The basic question: is it acceptable and objective to use, in general article text, the term "war criminal" to someone for which a great deal of incriminating data was listed, but was never tried and convicted by a court, such as [[Adolf Hitler]] or [[Josef Mengele]]? If that is unacceptable, should the words "war criminal" be deleted from a direct quote stating an expert opinion? | ||
| Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 22:05, 13 November 2010 (UTC) | [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 22:05, 13 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
'''moved comments to discussion page''' | '''moved comments to discussion page''' | ||
== Formal restatement of problem == | |||
''This section defines the section structure of the decision.'' | |||
=== Specific case: Usage of the term "war criminal" === | |||
=== Specific case: Redaction of a direct quote containing the term "war criminal" === | |||
=== General case: Usage of terms of art === | |||
=== General case: Redaction of quotes === | |||
== Existing applicable policy == | |||
=== Charter === | |||
*[[CZ:Charter#Article 4|Article 4]]: The Citizendium community shall recognize the special role that experts play in defining content standards in their relevant fields and in guiding content development towards reliability and quality. | |||
*[[CZ:Charter#Article 14|Article 14]]: Editors are Citizens whose expertise in some field of knowledge is recognized and formally acknowledged by the community. Official recognition of expertise — obtained through education or experience — and its scope shall be based on guidelines established by the Editorial Council. | |||
*[[CZ:Charter#Article 15|Article 15]]: Editors shall assure the quality of the Citizendium's approved content. They shall review and evaluate articles and shall have the right to | |||
#approve high-quality articles that treat their topic adequately; | |||
#resolve disputes over specific content matters when requested; | |||
#enforce style and content guidelines as established by the Editorial Council; and | |||
#identify for discussion incorrect or poorly presented content. | |||
*[[CZ:Charter#Article 17|Article 17]]: An Editorial Council shall be empowered to develop policy on content and style. | |||
*[[CZ:Charter#Article 19|Article 19]]: All articles shall treat their subjects comprehensively, neutrally, and objectively to the greatest degree possible in a well-written narrative, complementing text with other suitable material and media. | |||
=== Decisions by the governing bodies === | |||
None so far. | |||
=== Pre-Charter policy === | |||
*[[CZ:Editors]] | |||
*[[CZ:Workgroups]] | |||
== Draft decision == | |||
[[Category:Managing Editor/Pending decisions]] | [[Category:Managing Editor/Pending decisions]] | ||
Revision as of 18:14, 13 November 2010
Statement of problem
The basic question: is it acceptable and objective to use, in general article text, the term "war criminal" to someone for which a great deal of incriminating data was listed, but was never tried and convicted by a court, such as Adolf Hitler or Josef Mengele? If that is unacceptable, should the words "war criminal" be deleted from a direct quote stating an expert opinion?
As a History and Military Editor, I would rule that the usage is acceptable, especially in the often-vague and unprecedented legal situation following WWII. I have not yet so ruled, as I'm the main author of the Mengele article. I'd hate to disturb Russell, another history editor, when he's overloaded with MC matters.
I will introduce the matter as part of a broader Editorial Council discussion of how Charter Article 19, in particular, overrides the older CZ: Neutrality Policy.
Howard C. Berkowitz 22:05, 13 November 2010 (UTC) moved comments to discussion page
Formal restatement of problem
This section defines the section structure of the decision.
Specific case: Usage of the term "war criminal"
Specific case: Redaction of a direct quote containing the term "war criminal"
General case: Usage of terms of art
General case: Redaction of quotes
Existing applicable policy
Charter
- Article 4: The Citizendium community shall recognize the special role that experts play in defining content standards in their relevant fields and in guiding content development towards reliability and quality.
- Article 14: Editors are Citizens whose expertise in some field of knowledge is recognized and formally acknowledged by the community. Official recognition of expertise — obtained through education or experience — and its scope shall be based on guidelines established by the Editorial Council.
- Article 15: Editors shall assure the quality of the Citizendium's approved content. They shall review and evaluate articles and shall have the right to
- approve high-quality articles that treat their topic adequately;
- resolve disputes over specific content matters when requested;
- enforce style and content guidelines as established by the Editorial Council; and
- identify for discussion incorrect or poorly presented content.
- Article 17: An Editorial Council shall be empowered to develop policy on content and style.
- Article 19: All articles shall treat their subjects comprehensively, neutrally, and objectively to the greatest degree possible in a well-written narrative, complementing text with other suitable material and media.
Decisions by the governing bodies
None so far.