User talk:Milton Beychok/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer
No edit summary
imported>Paul Wormer
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Milt, I don't understand:
*Milt, I don't understand:


"In the United States, the retail sales processed natural gas to end users are"  
"In the United States, the retail sales processed natural gas to end users are"  


Could you phrase this differently? --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 15:03, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Could you phrase this differently?  
 
 
*In the section natural gas reserve you say:
 
"the propane, butanes and pentanes it contains may partially condense upon depressurizing — an effect called [[retrograde condensation]]. The liquids thus formed may get trapped by depositing in the pores of the gas reservoir. One method to deal with this problem is to reinject dried gas free of condensate to maintain the underground pressure and to allow re-evaporation and extraction of condensates."
 
but this is a repetition of something you said a little above.  May be you could add: "as discussed above" or something similar.
 
*I finished reading it and found it very informative, if you label it "chemistry" I will approve it.
 
-[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 15:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:20, 22 September 2009

  • Milt, I don't understand:

"In the United States, the retail sales processed natural gas to end users are"

Could you phrase this differently?


  • In the section natural gas reserve you say:

"the propane, butanes and pentanes it contains may partially condense upon depressurizing — an effect called retrograde condensation. The liquids thus formed may get trapped by depositing in the pores of the gas reservoir. One method to deal with this problem is to reinject dried gas free of condensate to maintain the underground pressure and to allow re-evaporation and extraction of condensates."

but this is a repetition of something you said a little above. May be you could add: "as discussed above" or something similar.

  • I finished reading it and found it very informative, if you label it "chemistry" I will approve it.

-Paul Wormer 15:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)