User talk:Milton Beychok/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Milton Beychok
imported>Milton Beychok
Line 7: Line 7:
:*The discussion of sulfur-dioxide smogs in London should mention that they occurred in the 19th century: In response,I have added mention that they occured in the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century.
:*The discussion of sulfur-dioxide smogs in London should mention that they occurred in the 19th century: In response,I have added mention that they occured in the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century.
:*Emission of hydrocarbon vapors due to high vapor pressures of gasolines has more relevance to air quality than to gasoline formulations: In response, I still feel that controlling the vapor pressure is part of formulating gasoline and so I made no changes in the discussion of vapor pressure in the gasoline formulation section,
:*Emission of hydrocarbon vapors due to high vapor pressures of gasolines has more relevance to air quality than to gasoline formulations: In response, I still feel that controlling the vapor pressure is part of formulating gasoline and so I made no changes in the discussion of vapor pressure in the gasoline formulation section,
:*The discussion of octane rating is too detailed: In response, since octane rating is the most important property of gasoline to the general public, the artcile needs to explain what it is and how it is measured. To do that, the general public reader must be given some insight as to how an internal combustion engine works. I have re-read that section and I can see no way to shorten it.  
:*The discussion of octane rating is too detailed: In response, since octane rating is the most important property of gasoline to the general public, the article needs to explain what it is and how it is measured. To do that, the general public reader must be given some insight as to how an internal combustion engine works. I have re-read that section and I managed to delete perhaps a few dozen words. I cannot see how to delete more than that.


:I want to thank [[User: Wim Van Wassenhove|Wim Van Wassenhove]] for his reveiw and comments. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 21:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
:I want to thank [[User: Wim Van Wassenhove|Wim Van Wassenhove]] for his reveiw and comments. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 21:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:53, 20 April 2009

Soliciting reviews on this article about Gasoline

I would appreciate any review comments about this article by one and all. Milton Beychok 21:49, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Wim Van Wassenhove responded to my solicitation fora review and offered a few comments:
  • It should be mentioned that heavier crude oils required more complex refining configurations: In response, I have made such mention.
  • The discussion of sulfur-dioxide smogs in London should mention that they occurred in the 19th century: In response,I have added mention that they occured in the 19th century and the first half of the 20th century.
  • Emission of hydrocarbon vapors due to high vapor pressures of gasolines has more relevance to air quality than to gasoline formulations: In response, I still feel that controlling the vapor pressure is part of formulating gasoline and so I made no changes in the discussion of vapor pressure in the gasoline formulation section,
  • The discussion of octane rating is too detailed: In response, since octane rating is the most important property of gasoline to the general public, the article needs to explain what it is and how it is measured. To do that, the general public reader must be given some insight as to how an internal combustion engine works. I have re-read that section and I managed to delete perhaps a few dozen words. I cannot see how to delete more than that.
I want to thank Wim Van Wassenhove for his reveiw and comments. Milton Beychok 21:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Random comments

"Mogas" is the general term for gasoline in the U.S. Army; I had always assumed it was some corruption of "military gasoline". Now I know!

I'd consider moving the detailed regional composition material to a subpage, but, at the very least, moving "Properties that determine the performance of gasoline" before those tables -- things like "octane rating" are defined there, but are used in the earlier tables. If you do this, you may want to merge some of the material on "vapor pressure" from the "properties" section into the explanation of effects on air pollution. Howard C. Berkowitz 22:22, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks very much, Howard. Wow! You are one fast reader and writer! I don't know how you do it! I will wait to hear (hopefully) from the other 5 people I asked for comments before I make any changes. Regards, Milton Beychok 22:52, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Milton_Beychok/Sandbox&oldid=607547"