Alternative medicine (theories)/Bibliography: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Pierre-Alain Gouanvic (''A philosophical analysis of the evidence-based medicine debate'' attempts to clarify the nature of evidence-based medicine by performing a philosophical analysis of its relationship with altmed.) |
imported>Pierre-Alain Gouanvic (''Ethics and Complementary and Alternative medicine'') |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| accessdate = 2009-01-03 | | accessdate = 2009-01-03 | ||
}}</ref> attempts to clarify the nature of [[evidence-based medicine]] by performing a philosophical analysis of its relationship with alternative medicine. | }}</ref> attempts to clarify the nature of [[evidence-based medicine]] by performing a philosophical analysis of its relationship with alternative medicine. | ||
''Ethics and Complementary and Alternative medicine'' in [http://books.google.ca/books?id=Nmkm7zu7NDMC&printsec=frontcover&dq=%22alternative+medicine%22+%22department+of+philosophy%22&lr=&source=gbs_summary_s&cad=0 Conversations in Complementary and Alternative Medicine] | |||
(page 22) By Norma G. Cuellar, editor | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist}} | {{Reflist}} |
Revision as of 23:38, 2 January 2009
{{subpages}
A philosophical analysis of the evidence-based medicine debate[1] attempts to clarify the nature of evidence-based medicine by performing a philosophical analysis of its relationship with alternative medicine.
Ethics and Complementary and Alternative medicine in Conversations in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (page 22) By Norma G. Cuellar, editor
References
- ↑ Sehon, S.R.; Stanley, D.E. (2003), "A philosophical analysis of the evidence-based medicine debate", BMC Health Serv Res 3 (14): 1472–6963, DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-3-14. Retrieved on 2009-01-03