Talk:Serge Lang: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo No edit summary |
imported>Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Can someone explain to me why this is in the developed section? As far as I can tell, it is a reproduction of the Wikipedia article with only the second sentence changed and the bibliography removed.[[User:Barry R. Smith|Barry R. Smith]] 11:38, 30 March 2008 (CDT) | Can someone explain to me why this is in the developed section? As far as I can tell, it is a reproduction of the Wikipedia article with only the second sentence changed and the bibliography removed.[[User:Barry R. Smith|Barry R. Smith]] 11:38, 30 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
I don't know how it got developed status. Originally I wanted to rewrite the whole thing, but never got around to it. [[User:Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo|Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo]] 12:06, 30 March 2008 (CDT) | I don't know how it got developed status. Originally I wanted to rewrite the whole thing, but never got around to it. Indeed, the structure of the wiki article is horrible... meanwhile you can figure out how to de-developed it, since I don't know how, and I'll chip away at it as I think more about a better structure for the article. [[User:Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo|Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo]] 12:06, 30 March 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 11:21, 30 March 2008
Can someone explain to me why this is in the developed section? As far as I can tell, it is a reproduction of the Wikipedia article with only the second sentence changed and the bibliography removed.Barry R. Smith 11:38, 30 March 2008 (CDT)
I don't know how it got developed status. Originally I wanted to rewrite the whole thing, but never got around to it. Indeed, the structure of the wiki article is horrible... meanwhile you can figure out how to de-developed it, since I don't know how, and I'll chip away at it as I think more about a better structure for the article. Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo 12:06, 30 March 2008 (CDT)