Talk:Tea Party movement/Archive 3: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
imported>Chris Day (→Images) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:There aren't policy papers or headquarters to show. --[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 03:00, 13 February 2010 (UTC) | :There aren't policy papers or headquarters to show. --[[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 03:00, 13 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I see what you mean. I guess I think of it as a protest movement and certainly it is closely related to their origins. I didn't really think of that as a slur, but if you think that lacks neutrality then better safe than sorry. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 03:22, 13 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:22, 12 February 2010
Images
Howard, are either of these useful for you? Chris Day 16:11, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Chris, good question. Certainly, they show real protests, but I would like other opinions if featuring such images gets away from neutrality. This isn't to say that the Tea Party Movement isn't largely a protest group, but should we be presenting such images for every protest group? I honestly don't know.
- There aren't policy papers or headquarters to show. --Howard C. Berkowitz 03:00, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- I see what you mean. I guess I think of it as a protest movement and certainly it is closely related to their origins. I didn't really think of that as a slur, but if you think that lacks neutrality then better safe than sorry. Chris Day 03:22, 13 February 2010 (UTC)