Accessibilism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Thomas Ash (Created article) |
imported>Thomas Ash No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Accessibilism is the position that whether someone's belief is justified supervenes only on facts to which that person has some sort of access. There are a variety of different views as to what form this access must take. The most common position is that it need only involve reflection. | Accessibilism is the position that whether someone's belief is justified supervenes only on facts to which that person has some sort of access. There are a variety of different views as to what form this access must take. The most common position is that it need only involve reflection. | ||
Accessibilism is sometimes, but not always, associated with the position that to have a justified belief one must be in a position to have a justified belief that one has that justified belief. | |||
Prominent advocates of accessibilism include [[Roderick Chisholm]] and [[Laurence BonJour]]. |
Revision as of 08:26, 29 May 2008
Accessibilism is the position that whether someone's belief is justified supervenes only on facts to which that person has some sort of access. There are a variety of different views as to what form this access must take. The most common position is that it need only involve reflection.
Accessibilism is sometimes, but not always, associated with the position that to have a justified belief one must be in a position to have a justified belief that one has that justified belief.
Prominent advocates of accessibilism include Roderick Chisholm and Laurence BonJour.