Talk:Christian Atheist Party: Difference between revisions
imported>Stephen Ewen mNo edit summary |
imported>Joe Quick mNo edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
I've requested editorial comment. —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 01:05, 27 July 2007 (CDT) | I've requested editorial comment. —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 01:05, 27 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
Line 4: | Line 5: | ||
::Yes, the template was used incorrectly but I think see Yi's reason for drawing attention to the article. Could be nothing, though, so I asked Richard to have a look here. —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 05:29, 27 July 2007 (CDT) | ::Yes, the template was used incorrectly but I think see Yi's reason for drawing attention to the article. Could be nothing, though, so I asked Richard to have a look here. —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 05:29, 27 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
There is almost nothing about this party online, but there is this:[http://gateway.uvic.ca/archives/featured_collections/uvic_newspapers/martlet_1960/The%20Martlet_1965_11_04.pdf] That's from an old student newspaper from the other side of Canada. | |||
There is probably only a question about maintainability here: in the fullness of time can CZ maintain decent articles about all present and past intercampus clubs? I think so, probably. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 06:03, 27 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
:Yep, and it was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christian_Atheist_Party&action=edit deleted from WP]. [[User:Yi Zhe Wu|Yi Zhe Wu]] 09:25, 27 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
::Ah, this is a "learning moment." (1) Maintainability is grounds for applying {{tl|delete}}, which only editors can make decisions on, not {{tl|speedydelete}}, which constables can execute on their own recognizance. (2) It was deleted from WP. So the **** what? :-) --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 13:38, 27 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
:::In particular, it was speedily deleted under WP:CSD#A7, the most abused of Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. Had a substantively similar article been deleted via the AfD process, I'd give that more weight. [[User:Anthony Argyriou|Anthony Argyriou]] 12:38, 30 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
I've done a touch of cleanup. I hope the original author can come back with some sources, and a description of student politics at the school, to put this article into better context. The title of Sartre's essay would be helpful, too. Right now the article is still just a stub. [[User:Anthony Argyriou|Anthony Argyriou]] 12:36, 27 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
:Fascinating read, the 1965 Canadian student newspaper. —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 13:07, 27 July 2007 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 23:54, 20 November 2007
I've requested editorial comment. —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 01:05, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
- On what grounds speedydelete? And why "spam"? I've removed the template. Yi, please see CZ:Article Deletion Policy. {{speedydelete}} can be placed only on the categories of articles on that page. --Larry Sanger 02:01, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
- Yes, the template was used incorrectly but I think see Yi's reason for drawing attention to the article. Could be nothing, though, so I asked Richard to have a look here. —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 05:29, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
There is almost nothing about this party online, but there is this:[1] That's from an old student newspaper from the other side of Canada.
There is probably only a question about maintainability here: in the fullness of time can CZ maintain decent articles about all present and past intercampus clubs? I think so, probably. --Larry Sanger 06:03, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
- Yep, and it was deleted from WP. Yi Zhe Wu 09:25, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
- Ah, this is a "learning moment." (1) Maintainability is grounds for applying {{speedydelete}}, which constables can execute on their own recognizance. (2) It was deleted from WP. So the **** what? :-) --Larry Sanger 13:38, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
- In particular, it was speedily deleted under WP:CSD#A7, the most abused of Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. Had a substantively similar article been deleted via the AfD process, I'd give that more weight. Anthony Argyriou 12:38, 30 July 2007 (CDT)
}}, which only editors can make decisions on, not {{
- Ah, this is a "learning moment." (1) Maintainability is grounds for applying {{speedydelete}}, which constables can execute on their own recognizance. (2) It was deleted from WP. So the **** what? :-) --Larry Sanger 13:38, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
I've done a touch of cleanup. I hope the original author can come back with some sources, and a description of student politics at the school, to put this article into better context. The title of Sartre's essay would be helpful, too. Right now the article is still just a stub. Anthony Argyriou 12:36, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
- Fascinating read, the 1965 Canadian student newspaper. —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 13:07, 27 July 2007 (CDT)