Talk:Octonions: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Andy Philpotts
No edit summary
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Octonions
 
|                cat1 = Mathematics
SHould the formula be i=0 under the sigma?  [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 04:10, 19 December 2007 (CST)
|               cat2 =
 
|                cat3 =
:The formula is botched,  I'll fix it.  Thanx :-)  [[User:Ragnar Schroder|Ragnar Schroder]] 04:27, 19 December 2007 (CST)
|           cat_check = n
 
|              status = 3
::Sounds like an elegant garnish for a cocktail. :-) [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 15:28, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Andy Philpotts|Andy Philpotts]] 11:53, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
}}

Latest revision as of 10:28, 4 September 2009

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A nonassociative and noncommutative extension of the quaternions. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Mathematics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

SHould the formula be i=0 under the sigma? Richard Jensen 04:10, 19 December 2007 (CST)

The formula is botched, I'll fix it. Thanx :-) Ragnar Schroder 04:27, 19 December 2007 (CST)
Sounds like an elegant garnish for a cocktail. :-) Howard C. Berkowitz 15:28, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Octonions&oldid=26740"