Al-Asadi v. Bush: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(copy editing)
mNo edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{subpages}}
'''Al-Asadi v. Bush''' (Civil Action No. 05-cv-2197) is a writ of [[habeas corpus]] filed on behalf of [[Guantanamo detainee]] [[Mohammed Ahmed Ali Al Asadi]] before [[US District Court Judge]] [[Henry H. Kennedy]].
{{TOC|right}}
 
'''Al-Asadi v. Bush''' (Civil Action No. 05-cv-2197) is a writ of [[habeas corpus]] filed on behalf of Guantanamo detainee Mohammed Ahmed Ali Al Asadi before U.S. District Court judge Henry H. Kennedy. The [[Military Commissions Act of 2006]] mandated that Guantanamo captives were no longer entitled to access the US civil justice system, so all outstanding habeas corpus petitions were stayed.<ref name=McaLetter2006-10-16/>
==Military Commissions Act==
 
The [[Military Commissions Act of 2006]] mandated that Guantanamo captives were no longer entitled to access the US civil justice system, so all outstanding habeas corpus petitions were stayed.<ref name=McaLetter2006-10-16/>


==Cited in other habeas petitions==
==Cited in other habeas petitions==
Line 12: Line 9:
==Boumediene v. Bush==
==Boumediene v. Bush==


On June 12, 2008 the [[United States Supreme Court]] ruled, in [[Boumediene v. Bush]], that the [[Military Commissions Act of 2006|Military Commissions Act]] could not remove the right for [[Guantanamo captives]] to access the US Federal Court system.  And all previous Guantanamo captives' habeas petitions were eligible to be re-instated.
On June 12, 2008 the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] ruled, in [[Boumediene v. Bush]], that the [[Military Commissions Act of 2006|Military Commissions Act]] could not remove the right for [[Guantanamo captives]] to access the US Federal Court system.  And all previous Guantanamo captives' habeas petitions were eligible to be re-instated.
The judges considering the captives' habeas petitions would be considering whether the evidence used to compile the allegations the men and boys were enemy combatants justified a classification of "enemy combatant".<ref name=BostonGlobe2008-10-24/>
The judges considering the captives' habeas petitions would be considering whether the evidence used to compile the allegations the men and boys were enemy combatants justified a classification of "enemy combatant".<ref name=BostonGlobe2008-10-24/>


==Re-initiation==
==Re-initiation==
{{wikisource|Misc. No. 08-442 (TFH) -- Doc 31: Statement regarding hearing of July 8, 2008}}
<!--
{{wikisource|Misc. No. 08-442 (TFH) -- Doc 31: Statement regarding hearing of July 8, 2008}} -->


Al Asidi's petition was renewed, as a former captive seeking relief for his former detention.
Al Asidi's petition was renewed, as a former captive seeking relief for his former detention.
On 3 July 2008, [[US District Court Judge]] [[Thomas F. Hogan]] issued an order regarding former Guantanamo captives, who might seek relief for their former detentions.<ref name=DoJ2008-07-03/> That order gave their attorneys until 14 July to respond with a brief status report, if they wanted to continue to proceed.
On 3 July 2008, U.S. District Court judge [[Thomas F. Hogan]] issued an order regarding former Guantanamo captives, who might seek relief for their former detentions.<ref name=DoJ2008-07-03/> That order gave their attorneys until 14 July to respond with a brief status report, if they wanted to continue to proceed.
Al Asadi's habeas petition was one of those on Justice Hogan's list.
Al Asadi's habeas petition was one of those on Justice Hogan's list.


On 9 July 2008 [[Zachary Katznelson]] filed a statement summarizing the status of this petition, and several others.<ref  name=Cv08-0442Doc31/>
On 9 July 2008 Zachary Katznelson filed a statement summarizing the status of this petition, and several others.<ref  name=Cv08-0442Doc31/>


On 14 July 2008, [[Andrew I. Warden]], a department of Justice official, submitted a motion requesting this and other petitions be dismissed.<ref name="Thomas F. Hogan" />
On 14 July 2008, Andrew I. Warden, a department of Justice official, submitted a motion requesting this and other petitions be dismissed.


==References==
==References==
Line 33: Line 31:
| title=NOTICE OF MILITARY COMMISSIONS ACT OF 2006
| title=NOTICE OF MILITARY COMMISSIONS ACT OF 2006
| publisher=[[United States Department of Justice]]
| publisher=[[United States Department of Justice]]
| author=[[Peter D. Keisler]], [[Douglas N. Letter]]
| author=Peter D. Keisler, Douglas N. Letter
| date=2006-10-16
| date=2006-10-16
| accessdate=2008-09-30
| accessdate=2008-09-30
Line 45: Line 43:
| title=Shaker Aamer v. George W. Bush -- 04-cv-2215: Motion to lift stay and for preliminary injunction enforcing Geneva Conventions
| title=Shaker Aamer v. George W. Bush -- 04-cv-2215: Motion to lift stay and for preliminary injunction enforcing Geneva Conventions
| publisher=[[United States Department of Justice]]
| publisher=[[United States Department of Justice]]
| author=[[Zachary Philip Katznelson]]
| author=Zachary Philip Katznelson
| date=2006-09-19
| date=2006-09-19
| accessdate=2008-12-29
| accessdate=2008-12-29
Line 57: Line 55:
| title=Hani Saleh Rashid Abdullah v. George W. Bush -- 05-cv-0023: Motion to modify stay order of April 8, 2005
| title=Hani Saleh Rashid Abdullah v. George W. Bush -- 05-cv-0023: Motion to modify stay order of April 8, 2005
| publisher=[[United States Department of Justice]]
| publisher=[[United States Department of Justice]]
| author=[[Stephen M. Truitt]]
| author=Stephen M. Truitt
| date=2006-09-26
| date=2006-09-26
| accessdate=2008-12-29
| accessdate=2008-12-29
Line 69: Line 67:
| title=Lawyers debate 'enemy combatant'
| title=Lawyers debate 'enemy combatant'
| publisher=[[Boston Globe]]
| publisher=[[Boston Globe]]
| author=[[Farah Stockman]]
| author=Farah Stockman
| date=2008-10-24
| date=2008-10-24
| accessdate=2008-10-24
| accessdate=2008-10-24
Line 76: Line 74:
</ref>
</ref>


<ref name=DoJ2008-07-03
<ref name=DoJ2008-07-03>
{{cite web
{{cite web
| url=http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2005cv00497/113842/65/0.pdf
| url=http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2005cv00497/113842/65/0.pdf
| title=PETITIONERS SEEKING HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF IN RELATION TO PRIOR DETENTIONS AT GUANTANAMO BAY: Order
| title=PETITIONERS SEEKING HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF IN RELATION TO PRIOR DETENTIONS AT GUANTANAMO BAY: Order
| publisher=[[United States Department of Justice]]
| publisher=[[United States Department of Justice]]
| author=[[Thomas F. Hogan]]
| author=Thomas F. Hogan
| date=2008-07-03
| date=2008-07-03
| accessdate=2008-12-29
| accessdate=2008-12-29
Line 93: Line 91:
| title=Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 31 -- STATEMENT REGARDING HEARING OF JULY 8, 2008
| title=Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 31 -- STATEMENT REGARDING HEARING OF JULY 8, 2008
| publisher=[[United States Department of Justice]]
| publisher=[[United States Department of Justice]]
| author = [[Zachary Katznelson]]
| author = Zachary Katznelson
| date=2008-07-09
| date=2008-07-09
| accessdate=2008-11-17
| accessdate=2008-11-17

Latest revision as of 11:14, 10 May 2024

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Al-Asadi v. Bush (Civil Action No. 05-cv-2197) is a writ of habeas corpus filed on behalf of Guantanamo detainee Mohammed Ahmed Ali Al Asadi before U.S. District Court judge Henry H. Kennedy. The Military Commissions Act of 2006 mandated that Guantanamo captives were no longer entitled to access the US civil justice system, so all outstanding habeas corpus petitions were stayed.[1]

Cited in other habeas petitions

Kennedy's ruling, lifting a stay imposed upon habeas petitions in 2005, pending the resolution of Boumediene v. Bush, was cited in several other habeas petitions.[2][3]

Boumediene v. Bush

On June 12, 2008 the Supreme Court of the United States ruled, in Boumediene v. Bush, that the Military Commissions Act could not remove the right for Guantanamo captives to access the US Federal Court system. And all previous Guantanamo captives' habeas petitions were eligible to be re-instated. The judges considering the captives' habeas petitions would be considering whether the evidence used to compile the allegations the men and boys were enemy combatants justified a classification of "enemy combatant".[4]

Re-initiation

Al Asidi's petition was renewed, as a former captive seeking relief for his former detention. On 3 July 2008, U.S. District Court judge Thomas F. Hogan issued an order regarding former Guantanamo captives, who might seek relief for their former detentions.[5] That order gave their attorneys until 14 July to respond with a brief status report, if they wanted to continue to proceed. Al Asadi's habeas petition was one of those on Justice Hogan's list.

On 9 July 2008 Zachary Katznelson filed a statement summarizing the status of this petition, and several others.[6]

On 14 July 2008, Andrew I. Warden, a department of Justice official, submitted a motion requesting this and other petitions be dismissed.

References

  1. Peter D. Keisler, Douglas N. Letter. NOTICE OF MILITARY COMMISSIONS ACT OF 2006, United States Department of Justice, 2006-10-16. Retrieved on 2008-09-30.
  2. Zachary Philip Katznelson (2006-09-19). Shaker Aamer v. George W. Bush -- 04-cv-2215: Motion to lift stay and for preliminary injunction enforcing Geneva Conventions. United States Department of Justice. Retrieved on 2008-12-29. “Judge Kennedy has already recognized in several other cases that Hamdan warrants lifting the stays in pending habeas petitions, and this court should do the same. See Order Lifting the Stay, Al-Asadi v. Bush, Civil Action No. 05-2197-HHK (September 11, 2006) [Dkt. No. 35]”
  3. Stephen M. Truitt (2006-09-26). Hani Saleh Rashid Abdullah v. George W. Bush -- 05-cv-0023: Motion to modify stay order of April 8, 2005. United States Department of Justice. Retrieved on 2008-12-29.
  4. Farah Stockman. Lawyers debate 'enemy combatant', Boston Globe, 2008-10-24. Retrieved on 2008-10-24.
  5. Thomas F. Hogan (2008-07-03). PETITIONERS SEEKING HABEAS CORPUS RELIEF IN RELATION TO PRIOR DETENTIONS AT GUANTANAMO BAY: Order. United States Department of Justice. Retrieved on 2008-12-29.
  6. Zachary Katznelson (2008-07-09). Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 31 -- STATEMENT REGARDING HEARING OF JULY 8, 2008. United States Department of Justice. Retrieved on 2008-11-17.