# Euclidean algorithm

In mathematics, the **Euclidean algorithm**, or **Euclid's algorithm**, named after the ancient Greek geometer and number-theorist Euclid, is an algorithm for finding the greatest common divisor (gcd) of two integers. The algorithm does not require prime factorizations and runs efficiently even when methods using prime factorizations do not.

## Contents

## The algorithm

### Simple but slow version

The algorithm is based on this simple fact: If *d* is a divisor of both *m* and *n*, then *d* is a divisor of *m* − *n*. Thus, for example, any divisor shared in common by both 1989 and 867 must also be a divisor of 1989 − 867 = 1122. This reduces the problem of finding gcd(1989, 867) to the problem of finding gcd(1122, 867). This reduction to smaller integers is iterated as many times as possible. Since one cannot go on getting smaller and smaller positive integers forever, one must reach a point where one of the two is 0. But one can get 0 when subtracting two integers only if the two integers are equal. Therefore, one must reach a point where the two are equal. At that point, the problem of the gcd becomes trivial.

Thus:

- gcd(1989, 867) = gcd(1989 − 867, 867) = gcd(1122, 867)

- = gcd(1122 − 867, 867) = gcd(255, 867)

- = gcd(255, 867 − 255) = gcd(255, 612)

- = gcd(255, 612 − 255) = gcd(255, 357)

- = gcd(255, 357 − 255) = gcd(255, 102)

- = gcd(255 − 102, 102) = gcd(51, 102)

- = gcd(51, 102 − 51) = gcd(51, 51) = 51.

Thus the largest integer that is a divisor of *both* 1989 and 867 is 51. One use of this fact is in reducing the fraction 1989/867 to lowest terms:

### Efficient version

In the example above, successive subtraction of 867 from the larger of the two numbers whose gcd was sought led to the remainder on division of the larger number, 1989, by the smaller, 867. Thus the algorithm may be stated:

- Replace the larger of the two numbers by the remainder on division of the larger one by the smaller one.

- Repeat until one of the two numbers is 0. The gcd is the other number.

The "simple but slow" version was presented only to show the simplicity of the underlying idea.

## Example

It is desired to find the gcd of 357765 and 110959.

to lowest terms. We have

- gcd(357765, 110959) = gcd(24888, 110959)

because 24888 is the remainder when 357765 is divided by 110959. Then

- gcd(24888, 110959) = gcd(24888, 11407)

because 11407 is the remainder when 110959 is divided by 24888. Then

- gcd(24888, 11407) = gcd(2074, 11407)

because 2074 is the remainder when 24888 is divided by 11407. Then

- gcd(2074, 11407) = gcd(2074, 1037)

because 1037 is the remainder when 11407 is divided by 2074. Then

- gcd(2074, 1037) = gcd(0, 1037)

because 0 is the remainder when 2074 is divided by 1037.

No further reduction is possible, and the gcd is 1037.

### Two applications

#### Reducing a fraction to lowest terms

It is desired to reduce

to lowest terms. We have

#### Finding a common denominator

It is desired to find the exact value of

(not a decimal approximation, such as any conventional calculator would give). We have

etc. The common denominator 38280855 is the least common multiple of the two denominators 357765 and 110959, and is much smaller than what would have resulted from multiplying the two denominators.

## Solution of linear Diophantine equations

In an example above we found the gcd of 357765 and 110959 to be 1037. In number theory it is of some interest that this entails that the Diophantine equation

can be solved in integers *x* and *y*. Generally if gcd(*a*, *b*) = *c*, then the equation

has a solution a pair (*x*, *y*) of integers. Moreover, if we make use of the quotients, rather than only the remainders, in the divisions we did while executing Euclid's algorithm, we can find *x* and *y*. Here is how:

As above, when we get 0 as a remainder, we know that the last remainder preceding it, 1037, is the gcd. Now we want to write the gcd, 1037, as a linear combination of the two numbers we started with, in which the coefficients *x* and *y* are integers. We start with the information on line (4) above:

This gives 1037 as a linear combination of the two numbers in square brackets, which were among the successive remainders. First, we replace the smaller of those two remainders with what line (3) tells us it is equal to:

This gives us 1037 as a linear combination of the two remainders that appear in line (3) above. Then, we replace the smaller of those two remainders with what line (2) tells us it is equal to:

This gives us 1037 as a linear combination of the two remainders that appear in line (2) above. Then, we replace the smaller of those two remainders with what line (1) tells us it is equal to:

This gives us 1037 as a linear combination of the two numbers we started with, 357765 and 110959. Thus *x* = −49 and *y* = 158 is a solution.