Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • Elysium's reactor with no moderator, capable of burning spent nuclear fuel and bomb cores.
    127 bytes (17 words) - 16:46, 19 March 2022
  • .... Like the [[Molten_chloride_salt_fast_reactor|MCSFR]], capable of burning spent nuclear fuel.
    177 bytes (28 words) - 03:41, 10 February 2024
  • {{r|Spent nuclear fuel}}
    1,013 bytes (137 words) - 20:36, 11 January 2010
  • {{r|Spent nuclear fuel}}
    2 KB (257 words) - 12:57, 15 March 2024
  • {{r|Spent nuclear fuel}}
    1 KB (209 words) - 12:57, 15 March 2024
  • {{r|Spent nuclear fuel}}
    2 KB (218 words) - 09:18, 6 March 2024
  • Auto-populated based on [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Spent nuclear fuel]]. Needs checking by a human.
    490 bytes (66 words) - 20:32, 11 January 2010
  • {{r|Spent nuclear fuel}}
    2 KB (247 words) - 09:18, 6 March 2024
  • ...>“Over the last 40 years, thousands of shipments of commercially generated spent nuclear fuel have been made throughout the United States without causing any radiologica **4000 employees, reprocessing Spent Nuclear Fuel for France and other countries
    9 KB (1,317 words) - 15:12, 25 October 2023
  • ...tron_reactor Fast neutron reactors] Wikipedia</ref> are capable of burning spent nuclear fuel, old bomb cores, depleted uranium and thorium.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com Normal reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel from standard water moderated reactors involves separation of fissile mater
    6 KB (935 words) - 19:43, 6 April 2022
  • '''Used nuclear fuel''' (often called '''spent nuclear fuel''') is nuclear fuel that has been irradiated in a [[nuclear reactor]] (usua
    8 KB (1,357 words) - 12:52, 15 March 2024
  • {{r|Spent nuclear fuel}}
    1 KB (201 words) - 12:57, 15 March 2024
  • **Dan Yurman (2022) Stanford's Questionable Study on Spent Nuclear Fuel for SMRs, [https://neutronbytes.com/2022/05/31/stanfords-questionable-study
    8 KB (1,033 words) - 12:21, 19 April 2024
  • ...fission products are contained in the rod. This means a smaller volume of Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF). Rods are easy to identify and count, which may be advantageous in pr ...waste flows for reactors of various types, we need to distinguish between Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) that goes to [[Nuclear_waste_management|Interim Storage]] and High Le
    12 KB (1,882 words) - 11:17, 21 April 2024
  • From ''600 year old spent nuclear fuel is just another poison'', Jack Devanney, 13 Jan 2023, [https://jackdevanney ...s can be contact handled without any shielding at all. After year 600, the spent nuclear fuel must be swallowed in order to do any damage."
    19 KB (2,949 words) - 20:17, 13 March 2024
  • ...>“Over the last 40 years, thousands of shipments of commercially generated spent nuclear fuel have been made throughout the United States without causing any radiologica [[Fast neutron reactor|Fast Neutron Reactors]] (FNRs) are capable of burning spent nuclear fuel, old bomb cores, depleted uranium, and
    23 KB (3,486 words) - 09:11, 19 April 2024
  • ...rom the clunkiest LWR to the fanciest paper HTGR. Either way the amount of spent nuclear fuel represents a beautifully small problem."
    18 KB (2,734 words) - 13:11, 8 August 2023
  • * FNRs are capable of burning spent nuclear fuel, old bomb cores, depleted uranium, and thorium.<ref>[https://www.youtube.co Given the current inventory of spent nuclear fuel (which contains the plutonium), it is possible to treat this waste material
    35 KB (5,379 words) - 12:53, 15 March 2024
  • ...ther than the tens of thousands of years needed by a light-water reactor's spent nuclear fuel. It also permits the use of alternate nuclear fuels, such as thorium. ...ecause they have separate facilities to produce the solid fuel and process spent nuclear fuel. The MSFR can operate using a large variety of fuel compositions due to its
    38 KB (5,549 words) - 12:55, 15 March 2024
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)