User talk:William Hart: Difference between revisions
imported>William Hart |
imported>William Hart |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::Apologies for not realising this was a better place for questions about bio details. You've answered the point of my question pertinently and appropriately. I intend to delete my remarks from the talk page on the article (but will revert if you'd prefer they remain there). [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 07:54, 17 February 2007 (CST) | ::Apologies for not realising this was a better place for questions about bio details. You've answered the point of my question pertinently and appropriately. I intend to delete my remarks from the talk page on the article (but will revert if you'd prefer they remain there). [[User:David Tribe|David Tribe]] 07:54, 17 February 2007 (CST) | ||
:::Sure, no problems. I was never a big WP contributor, so I don't really know much about the best way to do things either. You're welcome to delete the comments from the discussion page along with my response if you want, or leave it there as you wish. You could even transfer it all to this page if you wanted. But maybe it isn't that important. To further answer your questions, I'm actually considering not contributing much more to the article, just to see how it develops from here. I think it is fairly neutral (apart from the Popper comment, which Gareth wrote), and I'm just curious to see how it "evolves" under the "intelligent" direction of future contributors. Your summary for your edit to the talk page was pretty funny by the way. | :::Sure, no problems. I was never a big WP contributor, so I don't really know much about the best way to do things either. You're welcome to delete the comments from the discussion page along with my response if you want, or leave it there as you wish. You could even transfer it all to this page if you wanted. But maybe it isn't that important. To further answer your questions, I'm actually considering not contributing much more to the article, just to see how it develops from here. I think it is fairly neutral (apart from the Popper comment, which Gareth wrote), and I'm just curious to see how it "evolves" under the "intelligent" direction of future contributors. Your summary for your edit to the talk page was pretty funny by the way. [[User:William Hart|William Hart]] 08:06, 17 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 09:07, 17 February 2007
[User-supplied bio goes in User:Your Name]
Welcome
Tasks: start a new article • add basic, wanted or requested articles • add definitions • add metadata • edit new pages
Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start. You'll probably want to know how to get started as an author. Just look at Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, our help system and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. Be sure to stay abreast of events via Twitter. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forum is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any administrator for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun!
You can find some more information about our collaboration groups if you follow this link Citizendium_Pilot:Discipline_Workgroups.You can always ask me on my talk page or others about how to proceed or any other question you might have.
Kind Regards,
Robert Tito | Talk 08:09, 15 February 2007 (CST)
Hi William, thanks for the start on intelligent design. Could you give us a bio please? --Larry Sanger 09:07, 15 February 2007 (CST)
- Apologies for not realising this was a better place for questions about bio details. You've answered the point of my question pertinently and appropriately. I intend to delete my remarks from the talk page on the article (but will revert if you'd prefer they remain there). David Tribe 07:54, 17 February 2007 (CST)
- Sure, no problems. I was never a big WP contributor, so I don't really know much about the best way to do things either. You're welcome to delete the comments from the discussion page along with my response if you want, or leave it there as you wish. You could even transfer it all to this page if you wanted. But maybe it isn't that important. To further answer your questions, I'm actually considering not contributing much more to the article, just to see how it develops from here. I think it is fairly neutral (apart from the Popper comment, which Gareth wrote), and I'm just curious to see how it "evolves" under the "intelligent" direction of future contributors. Your summary for your edit to the talk page was pretty funny by the way. William Hart 08:06, 17 February 2007 (CST)