User talk:CZCharterVote: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards
imported>Hayford Peirce
(→‎test: new section)
Line 29: Line 29:
I do not wish to suggest in any way that there will be any impropriety when the draft committee ballots are counted. However, it would be prudent that the procedures used for this are fully transparent. Specifically, assurance that more than one constable will count the ballots would increase confidence in the balloting process. Making this public on the CZCharterVote page (and not just this talk page) would further ensure transparency of the process. [[User:Dan Nessett|Dan Nessett]] 18:51, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
I do not wish to suggest in any way that there will be any impropriety when the draft committee ballots are counted. However, it would be prudent that the procedures used for this are fully transparent. Specifically, assurance that more than one constable will count the ballots would increase confidence in the balloting process. Making this public on the CZCharterVote page (and not just this talk page) would further ensure transparency of the process. [[User:Dan Nessett|Dan Nessett]] 18:51, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
::Fair enough. I hope that this will be stated and implemented. [[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 18:59, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
::Fair enough. I hope that this will be stated and implemented. [[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 18:59, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
== test ==
does this send an email message to the voting email address?  if so, why? [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 19:21, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:21, 5 October 2009

Welcome!

Citizendium Getting Started
Register | Quick Start | About us | FAQ | The Author Role | The Editor Role
A dozen essentials | How to start a new article | For Wikipedians | Other
Home
Getting Started Organization Technical Help Content Policy Article Lists
Initiatives Communication Editor Policy Editorial Council Constabulary
Main Page

Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start. You'll probably want to know how to get started as an author. Just look at CZ:Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. Be sure to stay abreast of events via the Citizendium-L (broadcast) mailing list (do join!) and the blog. Please also join the workgroup mailing list(s) that concern your particular interests. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forums is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any constable for help, too. Me, for instance! Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun! Hayford Peirce 17:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Vote counting procedures

I do not wish to suggest in any way that there will be any impropriety when the draft committee ballots are counted. However, it would be prudent that the procedures used for this are fully transparent. Specifically, assurance that more than one constable will count the ballots would increase confidence in the balloting process. Making this public on the CZCharterVote page (and not just this talk page) would further ensure transparency of the process. Dan Nessett 18:51, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Fair enough. I hope that this will be stated and implemented. Martin Baldwin-Edwards 18:59, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

test

does this send an email message to the voting email address? if so, why? Hayford Peirce 19:21, 5 October 2009 (UTC)