Talk:Tennis/Catalogs/World No. 1 male players: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Charles Sandberg
No edit summary
imported>Hayford Peirce
(I'll take this up to 1968 or 1972, then stop. Maybe rename it.)
Line 11: Line 11:


This article states that it will be a catalog of players that have been World No. 1 for a year, but what about the players that have been No. 1 for less than a year? --[[User:Charles Sandberg|Charles Sandberg]] 16:29, 6 July 2007 (CDT)
This article states that it will be a catalog of players that have been World No. 1 for a year, but what about the players that have been No. 1 for less than a year? --[[User:Charles Sandberg|Charles Sandberg]] 16:29, 6 July 2007 (CDT)
:That question doesn't arise until around 1972 or so, when the ATP started weekly rankings. WP had long articles about the ATP ratings.  I then started a No. 1 World article, like the one here, but only up to 1972.  Other people then continued it but I dropped out.  With this one I don't plan to go any further than 1968 (start of Open play) or 1972 at the latest. It probably should be renamed at some point. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 16:46, 6 July 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 16:46, 6 July 2007


Article Checklist for "Tennis/Catalogs/World No. 1 male players"
Workgroup category or categories Sports Workgroup [Please add or review categories]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Hayford Peirce 12:47, 4 July 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





This article states that it will be a catalog of players that have been World No. 1 for a year, but what about the players that have been No. 1 for less than a year? --Charles Sandberg 16:29, 6 July 2007 (CDT)

That question doesn't arise until around 1972 or so, when the ATP started weekly rankings. WP had long articles about the ATP ratings. I then started a No. 1 World article, like the one here, but only up to 1972. Other people then continued it but I dropped out. With this one I don't plan to go any further than 1968 (start of Open play) or 1972 at the latest. It probably should be renamed at some point. Hayford Peirce 16:46, 6 July 2007 (CDT)