Talk:Social class: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
(not new theory -- just a typo)
imported>Joe Quick
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Social Class
|                cat1 = Sociology
|                cat2 = Anthropology
|                cat3 = History
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 3
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Joe Quick|--Joe Quick]]  ([[User talk:Joe Quick|Talk]]) 13:45, 23 May 2007 (CDT)
}}
== Workgroups and links ==
== Workgroups and links ==
Added workgroups and links to ethnic group and "race." [[User:Frank W Sweet|Frank W Sweet]] 17:36, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
Added workgroups and links to ethnic group and "race." [[User:Frank W Sweet|Frank W Sweet]] 17:36, 8 May 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 13:45, 23 May 2007



Article Checklist for "Social class"
Workgroup category or categories Sociology Workgroup, Anthropology Workgroup, History Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by --Joe Quick (Talk) 13:45, 23 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Workgroups and links

Added workgroups and links to ethnic group and "race." Frank W Sweet 17:36, 8 May 2007 (CDT)

entire article by CZ editor RJensen, so no need for Wiki reference. Richard Jensen 19:17, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
I do not understand. I added the categories so that the article would be linked to from the three appropriate main page entry points. Is there a better way of accomplishing this? Frank W Sweet 20:14, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
the links are still there. The best way is to have links on the other pages pointing to Social Class--this article. Richard Jensen 20:50, 8 May 2007 (CDT)

"ly" - typo or acronym?

"Iy was invented in the 1960s": If an acronym, is an explanation in order for a non-expert audience (eg: me), or is this a typo? Wahib Frank 05:48, 11 May 2007 (CDT)

Class and starta: Weberian models

Should this be "Class and strata: Weberian models"? Is this something to do with the Dreifach or three-component theory of stratification or another typo? Wahib Frank 05:52, 11 May 2007 (CDT)

another typo, not a new theory  :) Richard Jensen 13:59, 11 May 2007 (CDT)