Talk:Edward I/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
(approval)
imported>Chris Day
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages4}}
{{subpages2}}


==Nominated for New Article of the Week==
==Nominated for New Article of the Week==
Line 27: Line 27:


PS- Basic errors tend to be more common and persistent than complex ones by the way! [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 09:34, 10 August 2007 (CDT)
PS- Basic errors tend to be more common and persistent than complex ones by the way! [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 09:34, 10 August 2007 (CDT)
== approval ==
{{ToApprove
|url = http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Edward_I
|now =12:30, 13 August 2007 (CDT)
|editor=Richard Jensen
|editor2=
|editor3=
|editor4=
|group=History
|group2=
|group3=
|date =20070817
}}

Revision as of 22:31, 18 August 2007

Cluster

Edward I

Related Articles  #
Bibliography  #
External Links  #


Nominated for New Article of the Week

I have nominated this article to be the New Article of the Week! -- Carl Jantzen 09:58, 8 August 2007 (CDT)

Congratulations, Edward I! You're the first New Article of the Week! -- Carl Jantzen 13:09, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Article Review

This article needs a little more work, specifically in the rule of law section and the Scottish section. I will try and wrap it up in the next few days. Denis Cavanagh 03:52, 1 August 2007 (CDT)

I deem this article to be practically finished. Some of it was directly copied and pasted from some of the websites provided, but I feel I edited it succintly. Denis Cavanagh 07:27, 2 August 2007 (CDT)

Denis, you might as a next step find an editor to look things over. Just browse the history workgroup category.  —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 14:37, 3 August 2007 (CDT)

How exactly do you get someone to look it over, I don't want to bug anyone Denis Cavanagh 03:27, 8 August 2007 (CDT)

The Main picture

Can anyone fix the bit of text that got stuck behind the main picture? Denis Cavanagh 05:16, 9 August 2007 (CDT) Thanks, the whole article looks a good deal better now. Denis Cavanagh 06:43, 9 August 2007 (CDT)

Image of the Black Prince

I have removed the image associated with Llewelyn the Last, as it is—in fact—not him... Rather, this is the well-known effigy of the Black Prince from Canterbury Cathedral! I'm surprised this article got to New Article of the Week with such a basic error. Paul James Cowie 09:29, 10 August 2007 (CDT)

Whoops! I seen it listed as that on a reliable enough website - didn't even look at it properly enough to be honest. Denis Cavanagh 09:33, 10 August 2007 (CDT)

PS- Basic errors tend to be more common and persistent than complex ones by the way! Denis Cavanagh 09:34, 10 August 2007 (CDT)