Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ==Integrating Web 2.0 services==
    5 KB (768 words) - 21:25, 6 November 2010
  • ==Web 2.0== ...ites cannot yet afford the implementation overhead. But tools support for Web 2.0 design approaches continues to evolve rapidly as of 2008, and this has resu
    12 KB (1,802 words) - 08:48, 22 April 2024
  • ...ice.eu/resource/1680 2007, State-of-the-art in Good Practice Exchange and Web 2.0 - Report prepared by ePractice.eu - a project funded by the European Commi
    6 KB (945 words) - 20:25, 22 March 2008
  • ...riety of web based mashups. [[Tim O'Reilly]] lists Mashups as one of the [[Web 2.0]] technologies. <ref name="Web2.0"> title="Levels of the Game: The Hierarchy of Web 2.0 Applications"}}
    24 KB (3,761 words) - 14:00, 18 February 2024
  • ...the adaptive learning research area. Group collaboration is a key field in Web 2.0 which extends the functionality of distance learning. Adaptive learning can
    13 KB (1,938 words) - 10:30, 29 August 2008
  • ...ly in the broad set of media, software, websites, and venues identified as Web 2.0. Particularly when encountering existing or created web pages, the anonymou
    7 KB (1,051 words) - 18:31, 13 March 2024
  • ...of ''CMS'' is growing due to the expansion of web usage, especially with [[Web 2.0]] that allows web sites to interact with others web sites.
    26 KB (3,927 words) - 13:35, 11 May 2011
  • ...ogy blogs and news outlets more traditionally associated with discussing [[Web 2.0]] services. Despite numerous statements by scientists - including statement
    7 KB (1,041 words) - 13:05, 15 October 2010
  • :::Part of my pushing the argument here is also pushing the whole web 2.0 knowledge horizon. I agree with what Larry has said in other venues, that
    7 KB (1,230 words) - 19:42, 3 February 2009
  • ...t. Examples of this are [[mobile software agents]], [[Java Applet]]s and [[Web 2.0]] applications.
    15 KB (2,278 words) - 05:21, 8 March 2024
  • *'''Web 2.0 Technologies''' –Allows family and friends to browse for potential matche
    23 KB (3,464 words) - 11:48, 2 February 2023
  • ...rs. It fills me with pride to think that ''we'' have shown the world that Web 2.0 with "gentle expert guidance," with "village elders wandering the bazaar,"
    22 KB (3,725 words) - 05:48, 28 August 2020
  • ...f the rich, non-[[OLTP]] applications that are sprouting up as part of the Web 2.0 movement and often hosted by cloud providers. The schemaless nature of NoS
    46 KB (7,002 words) - 07:32, 18 September 2010
  • ...ama|good news from America]] - but I managed to summon up a few words on [[Web 2.0]]. No national parks for me, I'm afraid. --[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] 2
    18 KB (2,890 words) - 15:04, 15 April 2024
  • ...l these individual steps public, which is facilitated through the use of [[Web 2.0]] technologies in what has come to be called [[Science 2.0]].}}
    60 KB (9,261 words) - 15:41, 23 September 2013
  • ...l these individual steps public, which is facilitated through the use of [[Web 2.0]] technologies in what has come to be called [[Science 2.0]].}}
    64 KB (9,985 words) - 12:27, 24 March 2022
  • ...le, or, alternatively, that Google perpetuates the WP and superegalitarian Web 2.0 model. An alternative way to grow, however, is to show experts that there i ...probably noted that I've done a lot of work on social networks, not in the Web 2.0 sense but in the political, using, to some extent, techniques from intellig
    216 KB (35,266 words) - 10:45, 7 March 2024
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)