Open Knowledge Conference/Program/Collaborative Structuring of Knowledge by Experts and the Public: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
imported>Daniel Mietchen
Line 22: Line 22:
==Abstract==
==Abstract==
<!--Wikilink some key terms in there, e.g. [[institutional repository]]. -->
<!--Wikilink some key terms in there, e.g. [[institutional repository]]. -->
There is much debate on how public participation and expertise can be brought together in collaborative knowledge environments. One of the experiments addressing the issue directly is Citizendium. In seeking to harvest the strengths (and avoiding the major pitfalls) of both user-generated wiki projects and traditional expert-approved reference works, it is a wiki to which anybody can contribute using their real names, while those with specific expertise are given a special role in assessing the quality of content. Upon fulfillment of a set of criteria like factual and linguistic accuracy, lack of bias, and readability by non-specialists, these entries are forked into two versions: a stable (and thus citable) approved "cluster" (an article with subpages providing supplementary information) and a draft version, the latter to allow for further development and updates. We provide an overview of how Citizendium is structured and what it offers to the open knowledge communities, particularly to those engaged in education and research. Special attention will be paid to the structures and processes put in place to provide for transparent governance, to encourage collaboration, to resolve disputes in a civil manner and by taking into account expert opinions, and to facilitate navigation of the site and contextualization of its contents.
There is much debate on how [[public participation]] and [[expertise]] can be brought together in [[collaborative knowledge environment]]s. One of the experiments addressing the issue directly is [[Citizendium]]. In seeking to harvest the strengths (and avoiding the major pitfalls) of both [[user-generated content|user-generated]] [[wiki]] projects and traditional expert-approved [[reference work]]s, it is a wiki to which anybody can contribute using their [[real name]]s, while those with specific expertise are given a special role in assessing the [[quality]] of [[content]]. Upon fulfillment of a set of criteria like [[fact]]ual and [[linguistic]] [[accuracy]], lack of [[bias]], and [[readability]] by non-specialists, these entries are [[fork (software)|forked]] into two [[version control|versions]]: a stable (and thus [[citation|citable]]) approved "cluster" (an article with [[CZ:Subpages|subpages]] providing [[supplementary information]]) and a draft version, the latter to allow for further development and updates. We provide an overview of how Citizendium is structured and what it offers to the [[open knowledge]] communities, particularly to those engaged in [[open education|education]] and [[open research|research]]. Special attention will be paid to the structures and processes put in place to provide for [[transparency (behaviour)|transparent]] [[open governance|governance]], to encourage [[collaboration]], to resolve [[dispute]]s in a [[civil]] manner and by taking into account expert opinions, and to facilitate [[navigation]] of the site and [[contextualization]] of its contents.


==Notes and comments==
==Notes and comments==

Revision as of 06:32, 24 April 2010



Title

Collaborative Structuring of Knowledge by Experts and the Public

Authors

Tom Morris & Daniel Mietchen (also User:Tom Morris and User:Daniel Mietchen)

Keywords

open knowledge, open education, open science, open governance, wikis, expertise, Citizendium, Semantic Web

Abstract

There is much debate on how public participation and expertise can be brought together in collaborative knowledge environments. One of the experiments addressing the issue directly is Citizendium. In seeking to harvest the strengths (and avoiding the major pitfalls) of both user-generated wiki projects and traditional expert-approved reference works, it is a wiki to which anybody can contribute using their real names, while those with specific expertise are given a special role in assessing the quality of content. Upon fulfillment of a set of criteria like factual and linguistic accuracy, lack of bias, and readability by non-specialists, these entries are forked into two versions: a stable (and thus citable) approved "cluster" (an article with subpages providing supplementary information) and a draft version, the latter to allow for further development and updates. We provide an overview of how Citizendium is structured and what it offers to the open knowledge communities, particularly to those engaged in education and research. Special attention will be paid to the structures and processes put in place to provide for transparent governance, to encourage collaboration, to resolve disputes in a civil manner and by taking into account expert opinions, and to facilitate navigation of the site and contextualization of its contents.

Notes and comments