Manuscript peer review/Related Articles: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:41, 19 April 2010

Manuscript peer review: A variant of peer review in which scholarly manuscripts are being evaluated; used by academic publishing agencies to decide about formal publication. ^[e]

This article contains just a definition and optionally other subpages (such as a list of related articles), but no metadata. Create the metadata page if you want to expand this into a full article.

Research peer review [r]: Evaluation by experts of the quality and pertinence of research or research proposals of other experts in the same field. ^[e]
Scholarly publishing [r]: Add brief definition or description
Academic journal [r]: A regularly-published, peer-reviewed publication that publishes scholarship relating to an academic discipline. ^[e]

Grant peer review [r]: A variant of peer review in which grant proposals are being evaluated; used by research funding agencies to decide how to distribute their funds. ^[e]
Single-blind peer review [r]: The currently most common variant of peer review, in which the reviewers of a scholarly manuscript or grant proposal are informed about the identity of the authors, but not vice versa. ^[e]
Double-blind peer review [r]: A variant of peer review in which neither the authors nor the reviewers of a scholarly manuscript or grant proposal are informed about each other's identity. ^[e]
Open peer review [r]: A variant of peer review in which the authors of a scholarly manuscript or grant proposal are informed about the identity of the reviewers. ^[e]
Public peer review [r]: A variant of peer review in which the evaluation of a scholarly manuscript or grant proposal takes place in public before formal publication. ^[e]
Post-publication peer review [r]: Add brief definition or description
Book review [r]: Add brief definition or description

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 {{r|Public peer review}}
 {{r|Post-publication peer review}}
+{{r|Book review}}