Talk:Bitis parviocula

My formatting (now all reverted)

My problems were:

1. To place a "common names" line before the article rather than in the article looks very odd.
2. To use abbreviations rather than full names of unites is less clear for potential users (as is omitting a link to the relevant article).
3. To leave in Wikipedia templates that simply show up as red "template" signs is surely undesirable.
4. Why have something in "see also" which is already in the article? --Peter J. King 09:50, 13 February 2007 (CST)

See my answer on your talk page. --Jaap Winius 12:21, 13 February 2007 (CST)