Search results

|+Sensitivity and specificity of cardiac stress tests<ref name="pmid10357690">{{cite journal |author=Garb ! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]

! &nbsp;!![[Sensitivity and specificity|Likelihood ratio]]+ !! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Likelihood ratio]]-

* In one study, normal overnight oximetry was very [[Sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] and so if normal, sleep apnea was unlikely.<ref name="pmid83571 ...rations/hour, was very [[Sensitivity and specificity|specific]], but not [[Sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]].<ref name="pmid8539678">{{cite journal| author=Ryan PJ, Hilton

...alidating the prediction of lower urinary tract infection in primary care: sensitivity and specificity of urinary dipsticks and clinical scores in women. | journal=Br J Gen Pract

...immunoenzyme technique]], and [[polymerase chain reaction]] testing. The [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] of these tests range from 63% to 95%.<ref>Beyer WE. Heterogen The [[polymerase chain reaction]] is the most [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] test and is as sensitive as viral culture.<ref name="pmid192813

| Diagnosis||sensitiv*[Title/Abstract] OR sensitivity and specificity[MeSH Terms] OR diagnos*{Title/Abstract] OR diagnosis[MeSH:noexp] OR diagnos

: See also [[Bayes Theorem]], [[sensitivity and specificity]], and [[likelihood ratio]]. ...66 |issn=}}</ref><br/>([[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] plus [[Sensitivity and specificity|specificity]]) ||Easy to understand<br/>Stable with prevalence of disease

...creased from 0.795 to 0.799 and 12% of patients had improved estimates - [[sensitivity and specificity|net reclassification improvement]] (NRI) = 11%).<ref name="pmid20031795">{{

* [[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 88.4% * [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]] 81.1%

...und that DNA was more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] but less [[sensitivity and specificity|specific]]<ref name="pmid18838724">{{cite journal |author=Ahlquist DA, Sarg ...se negative rate (1-[[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]) 22%<br/>[[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]] 78%|| align="center"|[http://medinformatics.uthscsa.edu/calcu

...kul S, Maneerat J, Sa-nguansermsri T, Dhananjayanonda P, Tongsong T |title=Sensitivity and specificity of mean corpuscular volume testing for screening for alpha-thalassemia-1 an

* Total lymphocyte count of more than 2000 has [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]] or 95% * Total lymphocyte count of less than 1200 has [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]] of 95%

...me!!rowspan="2"|[[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!!rowspan="2"|[[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]!! colspan="2"| For 5% prevalence of osteoporosis <br/>as rep ...ty and specificity|Sensitivity]]<br/>(taken from Table 1 of Johansson)!! [[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]<br/>(calculated from Table 1 of Johansson)!! Positive predict

...s [[c-reactive protein]]||"myocardial infarction and CHD-related death"||[[sensitivity and specificity|Net reclassification improvement]] = 12%<ref>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1161 ...www.reynoldsriskscore.org/ Reynolds Score])||All cardiovascular events|| [[sensitivity and specificity|Net reclassification improvement]] = 8% (in men)<ref name="pmid18997194">{

...of recent studies show that alpha-fetoprotein determination lacks adequate sensitivity and specificity for effective surveillance (and for diagnosis). Thus, surveillance has to b

...nt Health Questionnaire (PHQ2) is a shorter questionnaire that may be as [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]] as the [[Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders| ...e PHQ2 is positive, then the SALSA questionnaire may be used to increase [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]]<ref name="pmid9855385">{{cite journal |author=Brody DS, Hahn

...disease never develops in many subjects with this genotype}}</ref>, its [[sensitivity and specificity]] are insufficient (65 and 68 percent, respectively) to be used as a diagno

...specificity|Specificity]]!![[Sensitivity and specificity|Sensitivity]]!![[Sensitivity and specificity|Specificity]]

...title=The accuracy of patients' judgments of disease probability and test sensitivity and specificity. | journal=J Fam Pract | year= 1998 | volume= 47 | issue= 1 | pages= 44-52

...ore specifically, [[enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay]]) tend to be more [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitive]].<ref name="pmid15096330">{{cite journal |author=Stein PD, Hull ! &nbsp; !! [[sensitivity and specificity|sensitivity]]!! [[sensitivity and specificity|specificity]]