Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- ...erent projects, and have become very interested in community management in Web 2.0. Since the only thing really differing CZ from WP is its pretensions toward2 KB (324 words) - 04:49, 22 November 2023
- {{rpr|Web 2.0}}3 KB (454 words) - 09:14, 28 March 2024
- ...uld be aware that no one will be assigning you work: this is a "bottom-up" Web 2.0 project, and it thrives precisely because people work on what they want, wh2 KB (364 words) - 03:15, 11 October 2007
- {{rpr|Web 2.0}}4 KB (660 words) - 10:45, 7 March 2024
- ...This is a matter of personal preferences of many individuals. Perhaps most web 2.0 participants are attracted by 'as free as possible' kind of license.4 KB (698 words) - 09:55, 4 November 2007
- ...ren't really seeing the potential that you would hope for with all of the Web 2.0 tools out there. We aren't seeing the academic community take advantage of7 KB (1,079 words) - 03:41, 22 November 2023
- {{rpr|Web 2.0}}11 KB (1,461 words) - 10:46, 7 March 2024
- ...riety of web based mashups. [[Tim O'Reilly]] lists Mashups as one of the [[Web 2.0]] technologies. <ref name="Web2.0"> title="Levels of the Game: The Hierarchy of Web 2.0 Applications"}}24 KB (3,662 words) - 09:57, 20 August 2023
- ...ice.eu/resource/1680 2007, State-of-the-art in Good Practice Exchange and Web 2.0 - Report prepared by ePractice.eu - a project funded by the European Commi6 KB (945 words) - 20:25, 22 March 2008
- ...tarted by a co-founder of Wikipedia, Dr. Larry Sanger, is quite unusual as Web 2.0 projects go. "We are focused on quality and responsibility as well as quan5 KB (685 words) - 19:30, 22 December 2007
- ...riety of web based mashups. [[Tim O'Reilly]] lists Mashups as one of the [[Web 2.0]] technologies. <ref name="Web2.0"> title="Levels of the Game: The Hierarchy of Web 2.0 Applications"}}24 KB (3,761 words) - 14:00, 18 February 2024
- ...the adaptive learning research area. Group collaboration is a key field in Web 2.0 which extends the functionality of distance learning. Adaptive learning can13 KB (1,938 words) - 10:30, 29 August 2008
- ...s hope that we can correct exactly the sort of abuses that people demonize Web 2.0 for,” said the project’s Editor-in-Chief, Wikipedia co-founder Dr. Larr4 KB (638 words) - 20:01, 21 February 2009
- ...am actively involved in the emerging field of [[Science 2.0]], in which [[Web 2.0]] tools like [[wiki]]s or [[blog]]s are combined with the [[scientific meth8 KB (1,029 words) - 04:54, 21 March 2024
- ...ly in the broad set of media, software, websites, and venues identified as Web 2.0. Particularly when encountering existing or created web pages, the anonymou7 KB (1,051 words) - 18:31, 13 March 2024
- {{rpl|Web 2.0}}4 KB (641 words) - 10:45, 7 March 2024
- ...rtually free of the sort of vandalism and irresponsibility for which other Web 2.0 projects are frequently criticized, partly because real names are required5 KB (770 words) - 12:30, 30 October 2007
- ...ttp://www.citizendium.org/roomforexperts.html Why Make Room for Experts in Web 2.0?] (text of keynote at SDForum from Oct. 24, 2006)5 KB (759 words) - 17:02, 5 March 2024
- :: Hey, this is a Web 2.0 project, so why don't we use some kind of flash ticker, controllable by the5 KB (855 words) - 21:08, 17 December 2007
- ...ought through one of her classes doing assignments here, including in some Web 2.0 and related areas. I personally would appreciate DNS review.6 KB (941 words) - 10:53, 7 March 2024